Constitutional framings of the right to abortion: A global view

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1093/icon/moad029
A. Śledzińska-Simon
{"title":"Constitutional framings of the right to abortion: A global view","authors":"A. Śledzińska-Simon","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At the present time, no national constitution expressly guarantees access to abortion as a human right. Yet, despite the absence of explicit constitutional provisions, a growing body of case law from countries’ highest courts recognizes abortion as a fundamental, natural right. Judicial interpretations of the right to abortion are evolving, with courts considering it a derivative of the constitutional guarantees of liberty, equality, dignity, or, more recently, the protection of health. Conversely, some courts, notably in the United States and Poland, have ruled out the possibility of such a right having constitutional status. This Reflection outlines current constitutional approaches to the right to abortion. It highlights an important paradigm shift in constitutional law toward framing abortion as part of the right to reproductive health, as already affirmed in international human rights law. Reproductive rights are now defined in relation to the state’s obligation, on the one hand, not to interfere with reproductive choices and, on the other hand, to provide women and girls with conditions ensuring freedom of choice, but also to determine the limits of their choices.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the present time, no national constitution expressly guarantees access to abortion as a human right. Yet, despite the absence of explicit constitutional provisions, a growing body of case law from countries’ highest courts recognizes abortion as a fundamental, natural right. Judicial interpretations of the right to abortion are evolving, with courts considering it a derivative of the constitutional guarantees of liberty, equality, dignity, or, more recently, the protection of health. Conversely, some courts, notably in the United States and Poland, have ruled out the possibility of such a right having constitutional status. This Reflection outlines current constitutional approaches to the right to abortion. It highlights an important paradigm shift in constitutional law toward framing abortion as part of the right to reproductive health, as already affirmed in international human rights law. Reproductive rights are now defined in relation to the state’s obligation, on the one hand, not to interfere with reproductive choices and, on the other hand, to provide women and girls with conditions ensuring freedom of choice, but also to determine the limits of their choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
堕胎权的宪法框架:全球视角
目前,没有任何国家宪法明文保证堕胎是一项人权。然而,尽管没有明确的宪法规定,各国最高法院越来越多的判例法承认堕胎是一项基本的自然权利。对堕胎权的司法解释正在演变,法院认为堕胎权是宪法保障自由、平等、尊严的衍生品,最近则是保护健康的衍生品。相反,一些法院,特别是美国和波兰的法院,已经排除了这种权利具有宪法地位的可能性。本反思概述了目前宪法对堕胎权的做法。它突出表明,正如国际人权法已经确认的那样,宪法在将堕胎作为生殖健康权的一部分方面发生了重要的范式转变。生殖权利现在是根据国家的义务来界定的,一方面,不干涉生殖选择,另一方面,为妇女和女孩提供确保选择自由的条件,但也确定其选择的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Can the people exercise constituent power? Route 66: Mutations of the internal market explored through the prism of citation networks Parallel incorporation and public law Naming and (mis)informing in academic publications The political economy of effective judicial remedies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1