Comparative study between S-(+)-ketamine–midazolam and fentanyl–droperidol in black-tufted marmosets (Callithrix penicillata)

Luiz Fernando Larangeira Lopes, V. Gris, M. Ferraro, S. Cortopassi
{"title":"Comparative study between S-(+)-ketamine–midazolam and fentanyl–droperidol in black-tufted marmosets (Callithrix penicillata)","authors":"Luiz Fernando Larangeira Lopes, V. Gris, M. Ferraro, S. Cortopassi","doi":"10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2022.188652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sedative and antinociceptive effects of two anesthetic protocols in black-tufted marmosets were compared in this study. Twenty-six marmosets underwent chemical immobilization for physical examination, blood sampling, tattooing, and microchipping. Animals were randomly treated with S-(+)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) and midazolam (1 mg/kg) (KM) or fentanyl (12.5 µg/kg) and droperidol (625 µg/kg) (FD) given by intramuscular injection. Heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Sedation, antinociception, muscle relaxation, posture, auditory, and visual responses were evaluated using a scoring system. Sedation in KM was achieved faster (p < 0.001) and lasted for a shorter period of time (p = 0.0009). KM was similar to FD in its cardiorespiratory effects, auditory and visual responses. Both protocols promoted adequate sedation to allow manipulation. Animals in KM assumed lateral recumbency while animals in FD maintained a quadrupedal posture during evaluation. FD produced less intense sedation and muscle relaxation but a higher degree of antinociception compared to KM and is suitable for procedures that require analgesia in black-tufted marmosets.","PeriodicalId":9119,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2022.188652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sedative and antinociceptive effects of two anesthetic protocols in black-tufted marmosets were compared in this study. Twenty-six marmosets underwent chemical immobilization for physical examination, blood sampling, tattooing, and microchipping. Animals were randomly treated with S-(+)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) and midazolam (1 mg/kg) (KM) or fentanyl (12.5 µg/kg) and droperidol (625 µg/kg) (FD) given by intramuscular injection. Heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Sedation, antinociception, muscle relaxation, posture, auditory, and visual responses were evaluated using a scoring system. Sedation in KM was achieved faster (p < 0.001) and lasted for a shorter period of time (p = 0.0009). KM was similar to FD in its cardiorespiratory effects, auditory and visual responses. Both protocols promoted adequate sedation to allow manipulation. Animals in KM assumed lateral recumbency while animals in FD maintained a quadrupedal posture during evaluation. FD produced less intense sedation and muscle relaxation but a higher degree of antinociception compared to KM and is suitable for procedures that require analgesia in black-tufted marmosets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
S-(+)-氯胺酮-咪达唑仑与芬太尼-哌啶醇对黑绒狨猴的比较研究
本研究比较了两种麻醉方案对黑绒狨的镇静和镇痛作用。26只狨猴接受了化学固定化检查、抽血、纹身和植入微芯片。动物随机接受肌肉注射S-(+)-氯胺酮(10 mg/kg)和咪唑安定(1 mg/kg)(KM)或芬太尼(12.5µg/kg)和氟哌利多(625µg/kg)(FD)治疗。记录心率和呼吸频率。使用评分系统评估镇静、镇痛、肌肉放松、姿势、听觉和视觉反应。KM的镇静速度更快(p<0.001),持续时间更短(p=0.0009)。KM在心肺效应、听觉和视觉反应方面与FD相似。这两个方案都促进了足够的镇静,以允许操作。KM中的动物采用侧卧姿势,而FD中的动物在评估过程中保持四足姿势。FD产生的镇静和肌肉放松强度较低,但与KM相比具有更高程度的镇痛感受,适用于需要对黑绒狨进行镇痛的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to publish full articles, preliminary notes and review articles in the fields of veterinary medicine, animal science and allied sciences, prepared by national and / or foreign, provided that meet the editorial standards
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Ultrasonographic aspects of the gallbladder mucocele in 30 dogs: retrospective study A systematic review of tetracycline resistance genes in animals and derived products in Latin America and the Caribbean Anesthetic protocol using propofol and isoflurane in spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) Co-infection of Cytauxzoon felis, Mycoplasma haemofelis, and the feline immunodeficiency virus in a domestic cat in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil Seroprevalence anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies and the risk factors in cattle of the tropical savannah of eastern Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1