Valuing and evaluating musical practice as research in ethnomusicology and its implications for research assessment

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Ethnomusicology Forum Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17411912.2022.2059772
Muriel E. Swijghuisen Reigersberg, S. McKerrell, A. Corn
{"title":"Valuing and evaluating musical practice as research in ethnomusicology and its implications for research assessment","authors":"Muriel E. Swijghuisen Reigersberg, S. McKerrell, A. Corn","doi":"10.1080/17411912.2022.2059772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we argue that ethnomusicology holds valuable epistemic insights for considering how to measure and evaluate research for academics, as well as for research policy and management professionals. We focus on two notable instances of standardised national research assessment frameworks: the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF), and Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) and identify the advantages of practice as research models for music research by considering the benefits of ethnomusicology’s reflexive and relativist methodologies to formal research assessment processes. To support our argument, we refer to published case studies of ethnomusicological research that reach beyond Western practice and thought to highlight the advantages recognising practice as research as a more inclusive modality of original knowledge production. We call upon ethnomusicologists to pro-actively engage with the formal processes of research assessment to make them more equitable and representative of our discipline’s broad commitment to decolonising academic practice.","PeriodicalId":43942,"journal":{"name":"Ethnomusicology Forum","volume":"43 3-4","pages":"28 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnomusicology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17411912.2022.2059772","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, we argue that ethnomusicology holds valuable epistemic insights for considering how to measure and evaluate research for academics, as well as for research policy and management professionals. We focus on two notable instances of standardised national research assessment frameworks: the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF), and Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) and identify the advantages of practice as research models for music research by considering the benefits of ethnomusicology’s reflexive and relativist methodologies to formal research assessment processes. To support our argument, we refer to published case studies of ethnomusicological research that reach beyond Western practice and thought to highlight the advantages recognising practice as research as a more inclusive modality of original knowledge production. We call upon ethnomusicologists to pro-actively engage with the formal processes of research assessment to make them more equitable and representative of our discipline’s broad commitment to decolonising academic practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族音乐学研究中音乐实践的价值与评价及其对研究评估的启示
在本文中,我们认为民族音乐学为学术界、研究政策和管理专业人士考虑如何衡量和评估研究提供了宝贵的认知见解。我们专注于标准化国家研究评估框架的两个值得注意的例子:英国的卓越研究框架(REF)和澳大利亚的卓越研究(ERA),并通过考虑民族音乐学的反思性和相对主义方法对正式研究评估过程的好处,确定实践作为音乐研究研究模型的优势。为了支持我们的论点,我们参考了已发表的民族音乐学研究案例研究,这些研究超越了西方实践,并强调了将实践作为研究作为一种更具包容性的原始知识生产方式的优势。我们呼吁民族音乐学家积极参与正式的研究评估过程,使其更加公平,并代表我们学科对非殖民化学术实践的广泛承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Articles often emphasise first-hand, sustained engagement with people as music makers, taking the form of ethnographic writing following one or more periods of fieldwork. Typically, ethnographies aim for a broad assessment of the processes and contexts through and within which music is imagined, discussed and made. Ethnography may be synthesised with a variety of analytical, historical and other methodologies, often entering into dialogue with other disciplinary areas such as music psychology, music education, historical musicology, performance studies, critical theory, dance, folklore and linguistics. The field is therefore characterised by its breadth in theory and method, its interdisciplinary nature and its global perspective.
期刊最新文献
In search of common ground: landscape and place-identity in contemporary British folk Music and the making of Portugal and Spain: nationalism and identity politics in the Iberian Peninsula Made in Nusantara: studies in popular music Education, music, and the lives of undergraduates: collegiate a cappella and the pursuit of happiness From Rumi to the whirling dervishes: music, poetry, and mysticism in the Ottoman Empire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1