Gender and cultural differences on death penalty support and views among Indian and U.S. college students

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15377938.2015.1015195
E. Lambert, D. Baker, O. Elechi, Shanhe Jiang, M. Khondaker, S. Pasupuleti, N. Hogan
{"title":"Gender and cultural differences on death penalty support and views among Indian and U.S. college students","authors":"E. Lambert, D. Baker, O. Elechi, Shanhe Jiang, M. Khondaker, S. Pasupuleti, N. Hogan","doi":"10.1080/15377938.2015.1015195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The death penalty is used as a criminal sanction in 58 out of 193 United Nations countries across the globe, yet the vast majority of research on capital punishment views has been conducted on Western nations, particularly the United States. This study examined the level of death penalty support among college students from both India and the United States. U.S. students expressed greater support for capital punishment compared to their Indian counterparts. In addition, men in both countries were more likely to support the death penalty. The reasons for supporting or opposing capital punishment also varied by gender and nation. Men expressed greater support for reasons of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, whereas women were more likely to oppose capital punishment for the reasons of rehabilitation, innocence, and morality. There were differences by nation on rationales to support or oppose capital punishment. Except for incapacitation, Indian students were more polarized in their reasons to support or oppose the death penalty. The findings support the contention that gender and culture play a role in the capital punishment views of the respondents in this study.","PeriodicalId":45166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice","volume":"27 4","pages":"254 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377938.2015.1015195","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2015.1015195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The death penalty is used as a criminal sanction in 58 out of 193 United Nations countries across the globe, yet the vast majority of research on capital punishment views has been conducted on Western nations, particularly the United States. This study examined the level of death penalty support among college students from both India and the United States. U.S. students expressed greater support for capital punishment compared to their Indian counterparts. In addition, men in both countries were more likely to support the death penalty. The reasons for supporting or opposing capital punishment also varied by gender and nation. Men expressed greater support for reasons of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, whereas women were more likely to oppose capital punishment for the reasons of rehabilitation, innocence, and morality. There were differences by nation on rationales to support or oppose capital punishment. Except for incapacitation, Indian students were more polarized in their reasons to support or oppose the death penalty. The findings support the contention that gender and culture play a role in the capital punishment views of the respondents in this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度和美国大学生对死刑支持和观点的性别和文化差异
摘要全球193个联合国国家中有58个国家将死刑作为刑事制裁,但绝大多数关于死刑观点的研究都是针对西方国家,尤其是美国。这项研究调查了印度和美国大学生对死刑的支持程度。与印度学生相比,美国学生表示更支持死刑。此外,这两个国家的男性更有可能支持死刑。支持或反对死刑的理由也因性别和国家而异。男性出于报复、威慑和丧失行为能力的原因表示更大的支持,而女性则更可能出于康复、清白和道德的原因反对死刑。各国在支持或反对死刑的理由上存在分歧。除了丧失行为能力之外,印度学生在支持或反对死刑的理由上更加两极分化。研究结果支持了性别和文化在本研究受访者的死刑观点中发挥作用的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice explores the prejudice that currently affects our judicial system, our courts, our prisons, and our neighborhoods all around the world. This unique multidisciplinary journal is the only publication that focuses exclusively on crime, criminal justice, and ethnicity/race. Here you"ll find insightful commentaries, position papers, and examinations of new and existing legislation by scholars and professionals committed to the study of ethnicity and criminal justice. In addition, the Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice presents the latest empirical findings, theoretical discussion, and research on social and criminal justice issues.
期刊最新文献
Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of a racial bias in the #MeToo movement Race differences in the impact of juvenile detention on likelihood of young adult incarceration of males aging out of care A systematic review of systems-level strategies to reduce disproportionate minority contact in juvenile justice systems Is ethnic and racial identity a potentiating or protective factor in the association between youth victimization and gang-joining? Distinguishing between exploration and affirmation Time lost as a result of wrongful conviction: the impact of race and official misconduct across offense categories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1