The evolution and development of the principle of free, prior and informed consent in South Africa

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2022.2090427
Naledzani Mukwevho
{"title":"The evolution and development of the principle of free, prior and informed consent in South Africa","authors":"Naledzani Mukwevho","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2022.2090427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article traces the evolution of the principle of free, prior and informed consent within the South African developmental context. Internationally, free prior and informed consent presupposes that communities have the right to give or withhold consent to proposed development projects on the lands that they own, occupy or otherwise use. Specific to South Africa, research reveals that although the country has not formally adopted the free, prior and informed consent principle within its development system, the spirit of the principle has permeated the development discourse in the country through development policies, legislation and case law. All major development policies in South Africa embody the public participation element, which is a precursor to free, prior and informed consent. Several Acts of parliament specifically require that communities’ consent must be sought and obtained before any development may take place in their territories. This sentiment has recently been augmented by court cases, both at High Court and Constitutional Court levels.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"48 6","pages":"144 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2090427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article traces the evolution of the principle of free, prior and informed consent within the South African developmental context. Internationally, free prior and informed consent presupposes that communities have the right to give or withhold consent to proposed development projects on the lands that they own, occupy or otherwise use. Specific to South Africa, research reveals that although the country has not formally adopted the free, prior and informed consent principle within its development system, the spirit of the principle has permeated the development discourse in the country through development policies, legislation and case law. All major development policies in South Africa embody the public participation element, which is a precursor to free, prior and informed consent. Several Acts of parliament specifically require that communities’ consent must be sought and obtained before any development may take place in their territories. This sentiment has recently been augmented by court cases, both at High Court and Constitutional Court levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非自由、事先和知情同意原则的演变和发展
本文追溯了自由、事先和知情同意原则在南非发展背景下的演变。在国际上,自由的事先知情同意的先决条件是,社区有权对在其拥有、占用或以其他方式使用的土地上拟议的开发项目给予或拒绝同意。具体到南非,研究表明,尽管该国尚未在其发展制度中正式采用自由、事先和知情同意原则,但该原则的精神已通过发展政策、立法和判例法渗透到该国的发展话语中。南非的所有主要发展政策都体现了公众参与的因素,这是自由、事先和知情同意的先决条件。议会的几项法案明确规定,在其领土上进行任何开发活动之前,必须征求并获得社区的同意。最近,高等法院和宪法法院的案件进一步加强了这种情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1