Mobility Biopolitics and the Aquarium as a Paradigm of Political Space

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.25138/14.3.A7
Jinhyoung Lee
{"title":"Mobility Biopolitics and the Aquarium as a Paradigm of Political Space","authors":"Jinhyoung Lee","doi":"10.25138/14.3.A7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Namcheon Kim’s novel The Aquarium of Love and, using Japanese colonialism as an example, identifies the aquarium as a paradigm of political space in terms of the right to mobility. It pays special attention to mobility biopolitics which a colonial biopower imposes upon the colonized lives by managing their mobilities, redefining the threshold in life. In the novel, Kim describes colonial Korea as a mobile society composed of citizens with the right to mobility and non-citizens without it, and as a colonial-political space in which a colonial biopower excludes (probably) threatening mobilities from society for the maintenance of the colonial regime. In the colonial-political mobile space, non-citizens, including the poor and the threats, are identified as lives devoid of value. At the same time, by utilizing an aquarium as a paradigm of political space, Kim characterizes citizens in the colonial society as fish in an aquarium, who (un)consciously practice “sheer political thoughtlessness,” restricting their movements within “animal reaction and fulfillment of functions.” Thus, as the colonized, citizens and non-citizens are homogenized equally as the bare life deprived of political rights, that is, the sacred life. Thus, the aquarium discloses the colonial space’s insubstantiality originating from the categorical exclusion of political subjects, which then encourages the politics of “more than” to seek the decolonized-humanized formation of society.","PeriodicalId":41978,"journal":{"name":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25138/14.3.A7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines Namcheon Kim’s novel The Aquarium of Love and, using Japanese colonialism as an example, identifies the aquarium as a paradigm of political space in terms of the right to mobility. It pays special attention to mobility biopolitics which a colonial biopower imposes upon the colonized lives by managing their mobilities, redefining the threshold in life. In the novel, Kim describes colonial Korea as a mobile society composed of citizens with the right to mobility and non-citizens without it, and as a colonial-political space in which a colonial biopower excludes (probably) threatening mobilities from society for the maintenance of the colonial regime. In the colonial-political mobile space, non-citizens, including the poor and the threats, are identified as lives devoid of value. At the same time, by utilizing an aquarium as a paradigm of political space, Kim characterizes citizens in the colonial society as fish in an aquarium, who (un)consciously practice “sheer political thoughtlessness,” restricting their movements within “animal reaction and fulfillment of functions.” Thus, as the colonized, citizens and non-citizens are homogenized equally as the bare life deprived of political rights, that is, the sacred life. Thus, the aquarium discloses the colonial space’s insubstantiality originating from the categorical exclusion of political subjects, which then encourages the politics of “more than” to seek the decolonized-humanized formation of society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动性、生命政治与作为政治空间范例的水族馆
本文考察了金的小说《爱的水族馆》,并以日本殖民主义为例,将水族馆视为流动权方面的政治空间范式。它特别关注流动性生物政治,殖民生物权力通过管理被殖民者的流动性,重新定义生活的门槛,将其强加给被殖民者的生活。在小说中,金将殖民地朝鲜描述为一个由有流动权的公民和没有流动权的非公民组成的流动社会,以及一个殖民政治空间,在这个空间里,殖民生物力量将(可能)威胁性的流动性排除在社会之外,以维持殖民政权。在殖民地的政治流动空间中,非公民,包括穷人和威胁者,被认定为没有价值的生命。与此同时,通过利用水族馆作为政治空间的范式,金将殖民社会中的公民描述为水族馆中的鱼,他们(不)有意识地实践“纯粹的政治轻率”,将自己的行动限制在“动物反应和功能实现”内,公民和非公民被平等地等同为被剥夺政治权利的裸生,即神圣的生命。因此,水族馆揭示了殖民空间的虚幻性,这种虚幻性源于对政治主体的绝对排斥,从而鼓励“超越”的政治寻求社会的非殖民化人性化形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Birds of the Air, Lilies of the Field: Revisiting Animality in Heidegger through Derrida and Kierkegaard Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger The Zhuangist Primitivist Attitude Towards Technology: Further Questions for Thinking about Technological Orientation Fides et Ratio and the Evolution of the Thomistic Philosophic Tradition The Fountain Outside Heidegger's Hut, Black Forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1