Challenging Dominant Discourses: Peer Work as Social Justice Work

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Progressive Human Services Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/10428232.2017.1399036
Stacey L. Barrenger, V. Stanhope, K. Atterbury
{"title":"Challenging Dominant Discourses: Peer Work as Social Justice Work","authors":"Stacey L. Barrenger, V. Stanhope, K. Atterbury","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2017.1399036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT People with mental illnesses are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, and discourses concerning the medical model, criminalization, and criminality dominate the intervention landscape for this population. Using a critical postmodern lens, 45 in-depth interviews with peer specialists who had incarceration histories were analyzed to understand how they approach their work. Peer specialists with incarceration histories constructed new identities through their training and peer work by valuing experiential knowledge. Even in the face of power differentials, they challenged dominant discourses directly and indirectly and advocated for various forms of help for the people with whom they worked.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":"45 1","pages":"185 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2017.1399036","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2017.1399036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT People with mental illnesses are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, and discourses concerning the medical model, criminalization, and criminality dominate the intervention landscape for this population. Using a critical postmodern lens, 45 in-depth interviews with peer specialists who had incarceration histories were analyzed to understand how they approach their work. Peer specialists with incarceration histories constructed new identities through their training and peer work by valuing experiential knowledge. Even in the face of power differentials, they challenged dominant discourses directly and indirectly and advocated for various forms of help for the people with whom they worked.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战主流话语:同伴工作作为社会正义工作
摘要精神疾病患者在刑事司法系统中的比例过高,有关医疗模式、刑事定罪和犯罪的论述主导了这一人群的干预格局。使用批判性的后现代视角,对45位有监禁史的同行专家进行了深入采访,以了解他们是如何处理工作的。有监禁史的同行专家通过他们的培训和同行工作,通过重视经验知识,构建了新的身份。即使面对权力差异,他们也直接或间接地挑战主流话语,并主张为与他们共事的人提供各种形式的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
期刊最新文献
Meaningful Healthcare and Social Service Access for Homeless Populations: Generating Alliances Through Theories of Therapeutic Landscape An Ineffectual Sermon: Matthew Desmond’s Poverty, by America Social Work Journals and the Disciplinary Production of Alternative Knowledge(s) Social Justice, Anti-Racism, and Disproportionality in Social Work: A Capabilities Approach The Depiction of Mothers with Intellectual Disability: Critical Discourse Analysis of Parenting Capacity Assessments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1