Green banking adoption practices: improving environmental, financial, and operational performance

W. Aslam, Syed Tehseen Jawaid
{"title":"Green banking adoption practices: improving environmental, financial, and operational performance","authors":"W. Aslam, Syed Tehseen Jawaid","doi":"10.1108/ijoes-06-2022-0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe increased concerns for the environment have led organizations, businesses and nations to act environmentally friendly. This has also pressurized the banking sector to adopt green practices. However, there is a dearth of studies related to green banking (G-banking) adoption practices (GBAP) on banking performance. Hence, by considering the resource-based view theory, this study aims to examine the impact of GBAP on banking performance, i.e. financial, operational and environmental performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe data was acquired from banking personnel in Pakistan using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and a non-probability purposive selection technique. In total, 400 responses were gathered, on which data screening was performed to detect and delete outliers. On a useful sample of 360, partial least square-structural equation modeling was used to validate the hypotheses.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings revealed that GBAP positively affects the environmental, operational and financial performance of the banks. The findings further revealed that GBAP largely affects environmental performance followed by operational performance and financial performance, respectively.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study findings offer various insights to the policymakers and the banking sector to better implement G-banking practices in improving banking performance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies to look at the effect of GBAP on key performance outcomes, i.e. financial and operational performance. This study also verifies the use of resource-based perspective theory in the context of G-banking.\n","PeriodicalId":42832,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","volume":"42 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-06-2022-0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose The increased concerns for the environment have led organizations, businesses and nations to act environmentally friendly. This has also pressurized the banking sector to adopt green practices. However, there is a dearth of studies related to green banking (G-banking) adoption practices (GBAP) on banking performance. Hence, by considering the resource-based view theory, this study aims to examine the impact of GBAP on banking performance, i.e. financial, operational and environmental performance. Design/methodology/approach The data was acquired from banking personnel in Pakistan using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and a non-probability purposive selection technique. In total, 400 responses were gathered, on which data screening was performed to detect and delete outliers. On a useful sample of 360, partial least square-structural equation modeling was used to validate the hypotheses. Findings The findings revealed that GBAP positively affects the environmental, operational and financial performance of the banks. The findings further revealed that GBAP largely affects environmental performance followed by operational performance and financial performance, respectively. Practical implications The study findings offer various insights to the policymakers and the banking sector to better implement G-banking practices in improving banking performance. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies to look at the effect of GBAP on key performance outcomes, i.e. financial and operational performance. This study also verifies the use of resource-based perspective theory in the context of G-banking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色银行采用实践:改善环境、财务和运营绩效
目的对环境的日益关注促使组织、企业和国家采取环保行动。这也迫使银行业采取绿色做法。然而,缺乏关于绿色银行(G-banking)采用实践(GBAP)对银行绩效的研究。因此,本研究旨在通过考虑基于资源的观点理论,考察GBAP对银行绩效的影响,即财务、运营和环境绩效。设计/方法/方法使用五点Likert量表和非概率目的选择技术从巴基斯坦的银行人员那里获得数据。总共收集了400份回复,对其进行了数据筛选,以检测和删除异常值。在360个有用的样本上,使用偏最小二乘结构方程建模来验证假设。调查结果显示,GBAP对银行的环境、运营和财务绩效有积极影响。研究结果进一步表明,GBAP在很大程度上影响环境绩效,其次分别是运营绩效和财务绩效。实际意义研究结果为政策制定者和银行业提供了各种见解,以更好地实施G-banking实践,改善银行业绩。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一批研究GBAP对关键绩效结果(即财务和运营绩效)影响的研究之一。本研究还验证了基于资源的视角理论在G-banking背景下的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Ethics and Systems (formerly named Humanomics, the International Journal of Systems and Ethics) is a multidisciplinary journal publishing peer review research on issues of ethics and morality affecting socio-scientific systems in epistemological perspectives. The journal covers diverse areas of a socio-scientific nature. The focus is on disseminating the theory and practice of morality and ethics as a system-oriented study defined by inter-causality between critical variables of given problems.
期刊最新文献
Whistleblowing intentions of external auditors: an application of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory Relational business model for shared responsibility The impact of external debt stock on economic growth: ethical dilemmas and evidence from East African community bloc Overcoming organizational politics and unlocking meaningful work through ethical leadership Ethical mindset and the efficacy of tax ethical awareness initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1