Midwifery as the first official profession of women in Russia, 18th to early 20th centuries

N. Mitsyuk, Мицюк Наталья Александровна, A. Belova, Белова Анна Валерьевна
{"title":"Midwifery as the first official profession of women in Russia, 18th to early 20th centuries","authors":"N. Mitsyuk, Мицюк Наталья Александровна, A. Belova, Белова Анна Валерьевна","doi":"10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-2-270-285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors study the institutionalization of midwife specialization among women in Russia in the period from the 18th through the early 20th centuries. The main sources are legislative acts, clerical documents, as well as reports on the activities of medical institutions and maternity departments. The authors use the approaches of gender history, and the concept of professionalization as developed by E. Freidson. Midwifery was the first area of women’s work that was officially recognized by the state. There were three main stages on the way to professionalizing the midwifery profession among women. The first stage (covering the 18th century) is associated with attempts to study and systematize the activities of midwives. The practical experience of midwifes was actively sought by doctors whose theoretical knowledge was limited. The second stage of professionalization (corresponding to the first half of the 19th century) was associated with the normative regulation of midwife work and the formation of a professional hierarchy in midwifery. The third stage (comprising the second half of the 19th century and the early 20th century) saw a restriction of the midwives’ spheres of activity, as well as the active inclusion of male doctors in practical obstetrics and their rise to a dominant position. With the development of obstetric specialization, operative obstetrics, and the opening of maternity wards, midwives were relegated to a subordinate position in relation to doctors. In contrast to the United States and Western European countries, Russia did not have professional associations of midwives. Intra-professional communication was weak, and there was no corporate solidarity. In Soviet medicine, finally, the midwives’ subordinate place in relation to doctors was only cemented.","PeriodicalId":41139,"journal":{"name":"Rudn Journal of Russian History","volume":"20 6","pages":"270-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rudn Journal of Russian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-2-270-285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors study the institutionalization of midwife specialization among women in Russia in the period from the 18th through the early 20th centuries. The main sources are legislative acts, clerical documents, as well as reports on the activities of medical institutions and maternity departments. The authors use the approaches of gender history, and the concept of professionalization as developed by E. Freidson. Midwifery was the first area of women’s work that was officially recognized by the state. There were three main stages on the way to professionalizing the midwifery profession among women. The first stage (covering the 18th century) is associated with attempts to study and systematize the activities of midwives. The practical experience of midwifes was actively sought by doctors whose theoretical knowledge was limited. The second stage of professionalization (corresponding to the first half of the 19th century) was associated with the normative regulation of midwife work and the formation of a professional hierarchy in midwifery. The third stage (comprising the second half of the 19th century and the early 20th century) saw a restriction of the midwives’ spheres of activity, as well as the active inclusion of male doctors in practical obstetrics and their rise to a dominant position. With the development of obstetric specialization, operative obstetrics, and the opening of maternity wards, midwives were relegated to a subordinate position in relation to doctors. In contrast to the United States and Western European countries, Russia did not have professional associations of midwives. Intra-professional communication was weak, and there was no corporate solidarity. In Soviet medicine, finally, the midwives’ subordinate place in relation to doctors was only cemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士是18世纪到20世纪初俄罗斯妇女的第一个官方职业
作者研究了18世纪至20世纪初俄罗斯妇女助产士专业化的制度化。主要来源是立法行为、文书文件以及关于医疗机构和妇产部门活动的报告。作者使用了性别史的方法,以及E. Freidson提出的专业化概念。助产是第一个被国家正式承认的妇女工作领域。在妇女助产专业专业化的道路上有三个主要阶段。第一阶段(涵盖18世纪)与尝试研究和系统化助产士的活动有关。理论知识有限的医生积极寻求助产士的实践经验。专业化的第二阶段(对应于19世纪上半叶)与助产士工作的规范性规定和助产士专业等级的形成有关。第三阶段(包括19世纪下半叶和20世纪初)看到了助产士活动范围的限制,以及男医生在产科实践中的积极参与,并上升到主导地位。随着产科专业化、手术产科的发展和产科病房的开放,助产士被降级为医生的从属地位。与美国和西欧国家相比,俄罗斯没有助产士的专业协会。专业内部沟通薄弱,没有企业团结。最后,在苏联医学中,助产士相对于医生的从属地位得到了巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reorganization of Diplomatic missions of the Russian Empire in North-East China During the Early XX Century: based on Materials from the Foreign Policy Archive of the Russian Empire History of St. Petersburg’s Pavements Familial Relations of Russian Naval Officer N.V. Kopytov: based on Epistolary Sources of 1866-1897 Defensive Social Practices in the History of Russia: the Early Formation of “Cancel Culture” or a Rare Event of the Past? Study of the Fuel Supply to Interior Cities in the Ivanovo and Vladimir Regions during the Great Patriotic War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1