Herramientas para un ajuste de dosis de tacrolimus más personalizado en el seguimiento de los pacientes con transplante renal. Fenotipo metabolizador según polimorfismos genéticos del CYP3A vs. el cociente concentración-dosis

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nefrologia Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nefro.2022.12.005
Anna Vidal-Alabró , Helena Colom , Pere Fontova , Gema Cerezo , Edoardo Melilli , Núria Montero , Ana Coloma , Anna Manonellas , Alexandre Favà , Josep M. Cruzado , Joan Torras , Josep M. Grinyó , Núria Lloberas
{"title":"Herramientas para un ajuste de dosis de tacrolimus más personalizado en el seguimiento de los pacientes con transplante renal. Fenotipo metabolizador según polimorfismos genéticos del CYP3A vs. el cociente concentración-dosis","authors":"Anna Vidal-Alabró ,&nbsp;Helena Colom ,&nbsp;Pere Fontova ,&nbsp;Gema Cerezo ,&nbsp;Edoardo Melilli ,&nbsp;Núria Montero ,&nbsp;Ana Coloma ,&nbsp;Anna Manonellas ,&nbsp;Alexandre Favà ,&nbsp;Josep M. Cruzado ,&nbsp;Joan Torras ,&nbsp;Josep M. Grinyó ,&nbsp;Núria Lloberas","doi":"10.1016/j.nefro.2022.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and justification</h3><p>The strategy of the concentration–dose (C/D) approach and the different profiles of tacrolimus (Tac) according to the cytochrome P450 polymorphisms (CYPs) focus on the metabolism of Tac and are proposed as tools for the follow-up of transplant patients. The objective of this study is to analyse both strategies to confirm whether the stratification of patients according to the pharmacokinetic behaviour of C/D corresponds to the classification according to their CYP3A4/5 cluster metabolizer profile.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Four hundred and twenty-five kidney transplant patients who received Tac as immunosuppressive treatment have been included. The concentration/dose ratio (C/D) was used to divided patients in terciles and classify them according to their Tac metabolism rate (fast, intermediate, and slow). Based on CYP3A4 and A5 polymorphisms, patients were classified into three metabolizer groups: fast (<em>CYP3A5*1</em> and <em>CYP34A*1/*1</em> carriers), intermediate (<em>CYP3A5*3/3</em> and <em>CYP3A4*1/*1</em>) and slow (<em>CYP3A5*3/*3</em> and <em>CYP3A4*22</em> carriers).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When comparing patients included in each metabolizer group according to C/D ratio, 47% (65/139) of the fast metabolizers, 85% (125/146) of the intermediate and only 12% (17/140) of the slow also fitted in the homonym genotype group. Statistically lower Tac concentrations were observed in the fast metabolizers group and higher Tac concentrations in the slow metabolizers when compared with the intermediate group both in C/D ratio and polymorphisms criteria. High metabolizers required approximately 60% more Tac doses than intermediates throughout follow-up, while poor metabolizers required approximately 20% fewer doses than intermediates. Fast metabolizers classified by both criteria presented a higher percentage of times with sub-therapeutic blood Tac concentration values.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Determination of the metabolizer phenotype according to CYP polymorphisms or the C/D ratio allows patients to be distinguished according to their exposure to Tac. Probably the combination of both classification criteria would be a good tool for managing Tac dosage for transplant patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18997,"journal":{"name":"Nefrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699522002004/pdfft?md5=3426efe7c94d9341a8551d9c29021e41&pid=1-s2.0-S0211699522002004-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699522002004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and justification

The strategy of the concentration–dose (C/D) approach and the different profiles of tacrolimus (Tac) according to the cytochrome P450 polymorphisms (CYPs) focus on the metabolism of Tac and are proposed as tools for the follow-up of transplant patients. The objective of this study is to analyse both strategies to confirm whether the stratification of patients according to the pharmacokinetic behaviour of C/D corresponds to the classification according to their CYP3A4/5 cluster metabolizer profile.

Materials and methods

Four hundred and twenty-five kidney transplant patients who received Tac as immunosuppressive treatment have been included. The concentration/dose ratio (C/D) was used to divided patients in terciles and classify them according to their Tac metabolism rate (fast, intermediate, and slow). Based on CYP3A4 and A5 polymorphisms, patients were classified into three metabolizer groups: fast (CYP3A5*1 and CYP34A*1/*1 carriers), intermediate (CYP3A5*3/3 and CYP3A4*1/*1) and slow (CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A4*22 carriers).

Results

When comparing patients included in each metabolizer group according to C/D ratio, 47% (65/139) of the fast metabolizers, 85% (125/146) of the intermediate and only 12% (17/140) of the slow also fitted in the homonym genotype group. Statistically lower Tac concentrations were observed in the fast metabolizers group and higher Tac concentrations in the slow metabolizers when compared with the intermediate group both in C/D ratio and polymorphisms criteria. High metabolizers required approximately 60% more Tac doses than intermediates throughout follow-up, while poor metabolizers required approximately 20% fewer doses than intermediates. Fast metabolizers classified by both criteria presented a higher percentage of times with sub-therapeutic blood Tac concentration values.

Conclusion

Determination of the metabolizer phenotype according to CYP polymorphisms or the C/D ratio allows patients to be distinguished according to their exposure to Tac. Probably the combination of both classification criteria would be a good tool for managing Tac dosage for transplant patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监测移植患者时更个性化的他克莫司剂量调整工具。根据CYP3A遗传多态性与浓度剂量比的代谢表型
背景和理由:浓度-剂量(C/D)方法和根据细胞色素 P450 多态性(CYPs)对他克莫司(Tac)进行的不同分析侧重于他克莫司的代谢,被建议作为移植患者随访的工具。本研究的目的是对这两种策略进行分析,以确认根据 C/D 的药代动力学行为对患者进行的分层是否与根据 CYP3A4/5 簇代谢物特征进行的分类一致。采用浓度/剂量比(C/D)将患者分为三组,并根据他们的 Tac 代谢率(快、中、慢)进行分类。根据 CYP3A4 和 A5 多态性,将患者分为三个代谢组:快速组(CYP3A5*1 和 CYP34A*1/*1 携带者)、中速组(CYP3A5*3/3 和 CYP3A4*1/*1 携带者)和慢速组(CYP3A5*3/*3 和 CYP3A4*22 携带者)。结果根据 C/D 比率比较各代谢组患者时,47%(65/139)的快速代谢者、85%(125/146)的中等代谢者和仅 12%(17/140)的慢速代谢者也符合同名基因型组。据统计,与中间组相比,快速代谢组的 Tac 浓度较低,而缓慢代谢组的 Tac 浓度较高,这与 C/D 比率和多态性标准有关。在整个随访过程中,高代谢者所需的 Tac 剂量比中间组多约 60%,而低代谢者所需的剂量比中间组少约 20%。结论根据 CYP 多态性或 C/D 比值确定代谢者表型可根据患者对 Tac 的暴露情况将其区分开来。将这两种分类标准结合起来,可能会成为管理移植患者 Tac 剂量的良好工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nefrologia
Nefrologia 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Nefrología is the official publication of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. The Journal publishes articles on basic or clinical research relating to nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and kidney transplants. It is governed by the peer review system and all original papers are subject to internal assessment and external reviews. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages.
期刊最新文献
A rare case of PD-related cardiac tamponade after cardiac surgery ¿Es posible alcanzar el objetivo de catéteres propuesto por las guías? Razones que determinan el uso de catéter en pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis La hipertensión arterial intradiálisis, un diagnóstico por descubrir 40 años de experiencia en síndrome de Bartter Arteriovenous fistula in persistent left superior vena cava scenario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1