Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Specialist Pub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI:10.1177/1938640019890738
James L. Thomas, A. Kopiec, K. Mark, L. Mae Chandler
{"title":"Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population","authors":"James L. Thomas, A. Kopiec, K. Mark, L. Mae Chandler","doi":"10.1177/1938640019890738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared. Level of Evidence: Level IV.","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"65 4","pages":"494 - 501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640019890738","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640019890738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化人群中Lisfranc离散的x线摄影价值
介绍。对Lisfranc关节的损伤,特别是第二跖内侧楔形关节(第二MMC)的损伤,很难评估,特别是在轻微的Lisfranc损伤中。本研究的目的是在标准化人群中确定成人足Lisfranc关节宽度(离断)的值,从而在调查该区域潜在损伤时建立一个潜在的参考范围。方法。对50名男性和50名女性的第二MMC关节进行了评估。有足部/踝关节疼痛史、既往足部/踝关节手术或骨折史或全身性疾病史的个体被排除在研究之外。采用标准化方法拍摄双侧负重数字前后位和侧位片。结果。200英尺的平均第2次MMC转移为5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81)。在女性人群中,平均第2 MMC转移为5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09),而男性为5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89)。在整个研究人群中,第五跖骨基部与第一楔形骨之间的平均距离为16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03)。结论。这项研究有助于为一般人群确定Lisfranc关节的基线测量值,这可以提供一个标准的测量值,用于比较可疑的足部损伤。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
Are SER-II Ankle Fractures Anatomic? Computed Tomography Demonstrates Mortise Malalignment in the Setting of Apparently Normal Radiographs. Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. Anterior Capsule Reconstruction in the Setting of PVNS. Management of Giant Cell Tumor of Talus With Extended Intralesional Curettage and Reconstruction Using Polymethylmethacrylate Cement. Regional Anesthesia Decreases Inpatient But Not Outpatient Opioid Demand in Ankle and Distal Tibia Fracture Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1