The Relationship Between Memory, Type, and Severity of Aphasia With Confrontation Naming in Post-stroke Patients With Chronic Aphasia

Reihane Saber-Moghadam, Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh, Mehrzad Momenzadeh, Mohammad Taghi Farzadfar, H. Ghaemi, D. Sobhani-Rad
{"title":"The Relationship Between Memory, Type, and Severity of Aphasia With Confrontation Naming in Post-stroke Patients With Chronic Aphasia","authors":"Reihane Saber-Moghadam, Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh, Mehrzad Momenzadeh, Mohammad Taghi Farzadfar, H. Ghaemi, D. Sobhani-Rad","doi":"10.32598/irj.20.4.1693.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The brain’s widespread neural functions lead to aphasia in which the patients experience difficulties in cognitive and language functions. Memory, type, and severity of aphasia are associated with language and the naming process. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between memory, type, and severity of aphasia using the confrontation naming test in post-stroke patients with chronic aphasia. Methods: This research was a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study. We selected 45 chronic aphasia patients aged 35-70 years. The participants with a mild to moderate score in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were assessed with the Persian naming test, Wechsler Memory Scale, and Persian Western Aphasia Battery. Results: There was a significant difference between memory with correct answers without a cue, correct answers with a semantic cue, and the total correct answers from confrontation naming (P<0.001, r=0.62; P=0.01, r=0.37; and P<0.001, r=0.71; respectively). Furthermore, the results indicated a significant difference between the type of aphasia with subtests of confrontation naming involving correct answers with semantic cues and total correct answers (P=0.02). Also, the results showed a significant difference between the severity of aphasia with correct answers without a cue, correct answers with a semantic cue, and the total correct answers from confrontation naming (P<0.001, r=0.77; P=0.03, r=0.31; and P<0.001, r=0.67; respectively). In comparing semantic and phonetic cues, memory, type, and severity of aphasia indicated significant association only with semantic cues. Discussion: There is an association between memory, type, and severity of aphasia with confrontation naming in patients with aphasia. The data have highlighted the importance of factors that need to be considered to formulate a comprehensive treatment plan to achieve further improvement in naming skills.","PeriodicalId":37644,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Rehabilitation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/irj.20.4.1693.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The brain’s widespread neural functions lead to aphasia in which the patients experience difficulties in cognitive and language functions. Memory, type, and severity of aphasia are associated with language and the naming process. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between memory, type, and severity of aphasia using the confrontation naming test in post-stroke patients with chronic aphasia. Methods: This research was a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study. We selected 45 chronic aphasia patients aged 35-70 years. The participants with a mild to moderate score in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were assessed with the Persian naming test, Wechsler Memory Scale, and Persian Western Aphasia Battery. Results: There was a significant difference between memory with correct answers without a cue, correct answers with a semantic cue, and the total correct answers from confrontation naming (P<0.001, r=0.62; P=0.01, r=0.37; and P<0.001, r=0.71; respectively). Furthermore, the results indicated a significant difference between the type of aphasia with subtests of confrontation naming involving correct answers with semantic cues and total correct answers (P=0.02). Also, the results showed a significant difference between the severity of aphasia with correct answers without a cue, correct answers with a semantic cue, and the total correct answers from confrontation naming (P<0.001, r=0.77; P=0.03, r=0.31; and P<0.001, r=0.67; respectively). In comparing semantic and phonetic cues, memory, type, and severity of aphasia indicated significant association only with semantic cues. Discussion: There is an association between memory, type, and severity of aphasia with confrontation naming in patients with aphasia. The data have highlighted the importance of factors that need to be considered to formulate a comprehensive treatment plan to achieve further improvement in naming skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中后慢性失语症患者的记忆、类型、失语症严重程度与对峙命名的关系
目的:大脑广泛的神经功能导致失语症,患者在认知和语言功能方面遇到困难。失语症的记忆、类型和严重程度与语言和命名过程有关。在本研究中,我们使用对抗命名测试来研究脑卒中后慢性失语症患者失语症的记忆、类型和严重程度之间的关系。方法:本研究采用描述性分析横断面研究。选择年龄35 ~ 70岁的慢性失语症患者45例。采用波斯语命名测验、韦氏记忆量表和波斯语西方失语症量表对轻度至中度精神状态检查(MMSE)得分的受试者进行评估。结果:无提示的正确答案记忆、有语义提示的正确答案记忆和对峙命名的正确答案总记忆差异有统计学意义(P<0.001, r=0.62;P = 0.01, r = 0.37;P<0.001, r=0.71;分别)。此外,结果显示,包含语义线索的正确答案的对位命名子测试失语症类型与全部正确答案之间存在显著差异(P=0.02)。无提示的正确答案、有语义提示的正确答案和对峙命名的总正确答案的失语严重程度差异有统计学意义(P<0.001, r=0.77;P = 0.03, r = 0.31;P<0.001, r=0.67;分别)。在语意线索和语音线索的比较中,失语症的记忆、类型和严重程度仅与语意线索有显著的关联。讨论:失语症患者的记忆、类型和失语症严重程度与对抗性命名之间存在关联。这些数据强调了在制定全面的治疗计划以进一步提高命名能力时需要考虑的因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Rehabilitation Journal aims to provide the readers with a variety of topics, including: original articles, hypothesis formation, editorials, literature reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports, letters to the editor, discussions of public policy issues and book reviews, and methodology articles in the fields of rehabilitation and social welfare, including (but not limited to): -Clinical and basic research in various special needs groups -Physical and mental rehabilitation -Epidemiological studies on disabling conditions -Biostatistics -Vocational and socio-medical aspects of rehabilitation IRJ also welcomes papers focusing on the genetic basis of common disabling disorders across human populations. Those studies may include (but not limited to): -The genetic basis of common single gene and complex disorders. -Bioinformatics tools to investigate and to model biological phenomena -Novel computational tools and databases -Sequence analysis -Population analysis -Databases and text mining
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Chest Wall Motions by Optoelectronic Plethysmography in Scoliosis Patient: A Case Study Incidence and Related Factors to Developing Dysphagia in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Neck Pain Severity and Work Ability Index: A Study of Tehran Dental Students Influence of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Altered Plantar Pressure Distribution and Ankle Biomechanics in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Syndrome Effects of Children’s Communication Disorders on the Quality of Life of Their Parents in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1