An Experimental Factor Analysis Study Using SAW and TOPSIS to Select and Rank Organic Agriculture Cities in Turkey

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI:10.18461/IJFSD.V12I2.81

Murat Çal, R. Sahin

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The agriculture sector supports Turkey’s GDP portfolio economically and helps establish a sustainable labor force. Turkey has certain competitive advantages in terms of the organic production of agricultural goods like figs and hazelnuts. We conduct a factor analysis using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods combined with a 3-level set (export volume, export value, and adequacy rate) to rank 32 candidate cities of Turkey where organic agriculture activities should be given more emphasis to support overall production and export rates. 18 different sets of importance values were used for this purpose and their combinatorial effects on candidate cities were analyzed. The factor analysis results show that the cities Izmir, Aydin, Adiyaman, Gaziantep, Agri, Mus, and Van have the highest potentials among all Turkish cities in both methods, while Sanliurfa also shows high potential for organic agriculture in the TOPSIS method.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

SAW和TOPSIS法在土耳其有机农业城市选择和排名中的实验因子分析研究

农业部门在经济上支持土耳其的GDP投资组合，并有助于建立可持续的劳动力队伍。土耳其在有机生产无花果和榛子等农产品方面具有一定的竞争优势。我们使用简单相加加权（SAW）和理想解相似偏好排序技术（TOPSIS）方法，结合三级集合（出口量、出口价值和充足率），对土耳其32个应更加重视有机农业活动以支持整体生产和出口率的候选城市进行了因子分析。为此，使用了18组不同的重要性值，并分析了它们对候选城市的组合影响。因子分析结果表明，在两种方法中，伊兹密尔、艾丁、阿迪亚曼、加济安泰普、阿格里、穆斯和凡等城市的有机农业潜力最高，而在TOPSIS方法中，桑柳尔法也显示出有机农业的高潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Understanding the development of the food system requires a system view that captures the complexity of the system and its many interrelationships with its economic, social and natural environments. The Journal accepts and offers papers within this broad range of issues focussing on the management, policy, marketing, consumer aspects, transparency, e-commerce, institutional or regional development, information and communication systems, ressource economics, production economics, chain management, network economics, and similar aspects. Papers may focus on modeling, empirical research or theoretical analyis. This broad range of publication opportunities asks authors to follow clear lines of arguments and to present arguments in a convincing way that avoids unnecessary complexities of model formulations if not relevant for the support of arguments. The publication of scientific articles is complemented by a number of sections that provide room for publications with a more specific focus: ''Case studies'': A section on case studies of the ''Harvard Type'' allows the publication of studies that might build on established scientific methodology but demonstrate its use in ceratin decision environments. Case studies might be complemented by ''teaching cases'' that are kept on a database outside the journal but accessible to readers on approval by authors. ''Research Forum'': It allows to discuss newly emerging research challenges or to contribute to ongoing scientific discussions on research problems. In addition, authors might initiate a discussion on issues brought up by articles published in the journal. ''Research Notes'': It provides room for specific shorter scientific contributions with a narrow scope.