{"title":"Child and Adolescent Psychodynamic Therapy: Using Q-Methodology in Process Research","authors":"G. Goodman","doi":"10.1080/00797308.2021.2022419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Psychotherapy for children and adolescents has been shown to be generally effective in treating a wide variety of psychological problems. In spite of this success, the field has been slow to identify the key therapeutic processes responsible for changes in psychiatric symptoms, emotional well-being, social relationships, and school functioning observed across theoretically different treatment models. The child and adolescent psychodynamic psychotherapy literature lags far behind the adult literature in assessing the change processes associated with the successful treatment of children and adolescents. This article reviews the rapidly growing literature engaged in the pursuit of articulating the change processes associated with successful treatment outcomes for children and adolescents. Two classes of change processes are reviewed: interaction structures (i.e., patterns of reciprocal therapist-patient interaction) and adherence to “brand-name” treatment models (e.g., child psychodynamic therapy). Researchers have used children’s psychiatric diagnoses most commonly as moderators of significant process-outcome associations. This article will explore the contributions of the Child Psychotherapy Q-Set (CPQ) and Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set (APQ) to this field of study, while also reviewing some of the data analytic strategies used. Finally, an outline of the future directions of child and adolescent psychodynamic psychotherapy process research using the CPQ and APQ is suggested.","PeriodicalId":45962,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Study of the Child","volume":"75 1","pages":"260 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Study of the Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.2021.2022419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Psychotherapy for children and adolescents has been shown to be generally effective in treating a wide variety of psychological problems. In spite of this success, the field has been slow to identify the key therapeutic processes responsible for changes in psychiatric symptoms, emotional well-being, social relationships, and school functioning observed across theoretically different treatment models. The child and adolescent psychodynamic psychotherapy literature lags far behind the adult literature in assessing the change processes associated with the successful treatment of children and adolescents. This article reviews the rapidly growing literature engaged in the pursuit of articulating the change processes associated with successful treatment outcomes for children and adolescents. Two classes of change processes are reviewed: interaction structures (i.e., patterns of reciprocal therapist-patient interaction) and adherence to “brand-name” treatment models (e.g., child psychodynamic therapy). Researchers have used children’s psychiatric diagnoses most commonly as moderators of significant process-outcome associations. This article will explore the contributions of the Child Psychotherapy Q-Set (CPQ) and Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set (APQ) to this field of study, while also reviewing some of the data analytic strategies used. Finally, an outline of the future directions of child and adolescent psychodynamic psychotherapy process research using the CPQ and APQ is suggested.
期刊介绍:
The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child is recognized as a preeminent source of contemporary psychoanalytic thought. Published annually, it focuses on presenting carefully selected and edited representative articles featuring ongoing analytic research as well as clinical and theoretical contributions for use in the treatment of adults and children. Initiated in 1945, under the early leadership of Anna Freud, Kurt and Ruth Eissler, Marianne and Ernst Kris, this series of volumes soon established itself as a leading reference source of study. To look at its contributors is to be confronted with the names of a stellar list of creative, scholarly pioneers who willed a rich heritage of information about the development and disorders of children and their influence on the treatment of adults as well as children. An innovative section, The Child Analyst at Work, periodically provides a forum for dialogue and discussion of clinical process from multiple viewpoints.