Impact of implementing five-level triage system on patients outcomes and resource utilization in the emergency department of Alexandria main university hospital

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2234712
A. A. Sabry, Wael Nabil Abdel Salam, Mohammed Mostafa Abdel Salam, K. Moustafa, E. M. Gaber, B. Beshey
{"title":"Impact of implementing five-level triage system on patients outcomes and resource utilization in the emergency department of Alexandria main university hospital","authors":"A. A. Sabry, Wael Nabil Abdel Salam, Mohammed Mostafa Abdel Salam, K. Moustafa, E. M. Gaber, B. Beshey","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2234712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective To investigate impact of five-level triage system on Emergency Department (ED) patients’ outcome and resources’ utilization. Design A comparative observational study (pre-/post-intervention). Setting ED of Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients All trauma patients and adult emergencies presented to ED from 1st of September 2021 to 31st of May 2022. Patients who were discharged or left against medical advice were excluded. Methods Five-level triage was implemented in 1st of December 2021 using Australasian Triage Scale. Primary outcome was ED mortality, while secondary outcomes were resources’ utilization and ED length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression model for predictors of ED mortality was used. Results Totally, 9766 and 22,936 patients were subjected to three- and five-level triaging, respectively. ED mortality dropped from 5.26% to 1.46%. All resources including human factors were less utilized. ED LOS has declined from 170.1 ± 88.7 to 72.00 ± 109.8 min. All changes were statistically significant, p < 0.05. Significant predictors of ED mortality were three-level triaging, medical emergencies, initial code-1, time-to-clinical decision > 60 min, >5 differential diagnoses, more interventions, and longer ED LOS with different Odds ratios. Conclusion Five-level triaging reduced rates of mis-triaging, ED mortality, resources’ utilization, and ED LOS. KEY FINDINGS Physician-led five-level triage system significantly improved ED mortality. Five-level triage significantly reduced resources’ utilization including human factors and ED Length of stay. Rates of mis-triaging and crowding dropped with reassessment and allocation of more treatment areas.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2234712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate impact of five-level triage system on Emergency Department (ED) patients’ outcome and resources’ utilization. Design A comparative observational study (pre-/post-intervention). Setting ED of Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients All trauma patients and adult emergencies presented to ED from 1st of September 2021 to 31st of May 2022. Patients who were discharged or left against medical advice were excluded. Methods Five-level triage was implemented in 1st of December 2021 using Australasian Triage Scale. Primary outcome was ED mortality, while secondary outcomes were resources’ utilization and ED length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression model for predictors of ED mortality was used. Results Totally, 9766 and 22,936 patients were subjected to three- and five-level triaging, respectively. ED mortality dropped from 5.26% to 1.46%. All resources including human factors were less utilized. ED LOS has declined from 170.1 ± 88.7 to 72.00 ± 109.8 min. All changes were statistically significant, p < 0.05. Significant predictors of ED mortality were three-level triaging, medical emergencies, initial code-1, time-to-clinical decision > 60 min, >5 differential diagnoses, more interventions, and longer ED LOS with different Odds ratios. Conclusion Five-level triaging reduced rates of mis-triaging, ED mortality, resources’ utilization, and ED LOS. KEY FINDINGS Physician-led five-level triage system significantly improved ED mortality. Five-level triage significantly reduced resources’ utilization including human factors and ED Length of stay. Rates of mis-triaging and crowding dropped with reassessment and allocation of more treatment areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施五级分诊制度对亚历山大大学总医院急诊科患者预后及资源利用的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1