Using Citizen Heritage Science to Monitor Remote Sites Before and During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Comparison of Two Methods

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1080/13505033.2022.2147299
Rosie Brigham, S. Orr, L. Wilson, Adam Frost, M. Strlič, J. Grau-Bové
{"title":"Using Citizen Heritage Science to Monitor Remote Sites Before and During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Comparison of Two Methods","authors":"Rosie Brigham, S. Orr, L. Wilson, Adam Frost, M. Strlič, J. Grau-Bové","doi":"10.1080/13505033.2022.2147299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes citizen heritage science as an effective method to gather reliable data for monitoring and documenting heritage sites. For large heritage organisations the monitoring and documentation of sites in their care presents considerable challenges;continual monitoring of smaller, unstaffed, and more remote sites is often not practical. However, heritage sites are often popular destinations that receive high levels of visitors who carry increasingly sophisticated mobile phones. It seems logical that heritage organisations capitalise on using visitors’ images to record and monitor remote heritage sites. We compare two methods for data collection: a ‘guided’ approach, in which on-site signage prompts visitor submissions;and an ‘open’ approach, in which the public is asked to send any photographs they have of the site in question. We analyse the different results in collected data from these two approaches and hope to encourage heritage institutions to set up similar projects. [ FROM AUTHOR]","PeriodicalId":44482,"journal":{"name":"Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2022.2147299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper proposes citizen heritage science as an effective method to gather reliable data for monitoring and documenting heritage sites. For large heritage organisations the monitoring and documentation of sites in their care presents considerable challenges;continual monitoring of smaller, unstaffed, and more remote sites is often not practical. However, heritage sites are often popular destinations that receive high levels of visitors who carry increasingly sophisticated mobile phones. It seems logical that heritage organisations capitalise on using visitors’ images to record and monitor remote heritage sites. We compare two methods for data collection: a ‘guided’ approach, in which on-site signage prompts visitor submissions;and an ‘open’ approach, in which the public is asked to send any photographs they have of the site in question. We analyse the different results in collected data from these two approaches and hope to encourage heritage institutions to set up similar projects. [ FROM AUTHOR]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在第一次新冠肺炎封锁之前和期间利用公民遗产科学监测偏远地区:两种方法的比较
本文提出公民遗产科学是一种收集可靠数据以监测和记录遗产地的有效方法。对于大型遗产组织来说,对其管理的遗址进行监测和记录带来了相当大的挑战;对规模较小、人手不足、距离较远的站点进行持续监控通常是不切实际的。然而,遗产地往往是受欢迎的目的地,吸引了大量携带越来越先进手机的游客。遗产组织利用游客的图像来记录和监控偏远的遗产地,这似乎是合乎逻辑的。我们比较了两种数据收集方法:“引导”方法,即现场标牌提示游客提交;以及一种“开放”的方式,要求公众发送他们所拥有的有关网站的任何照片。我们分析了从这两种方法收集的数据中得出的不同结果,并希望鼓励遗产机构建立类似的项目。[来自作者]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The journal Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites (CMAS) has established itself as the primary reference in this field, both for active professionals and for university teachers and students. Launched in 1995, it is the only journal that covers both theoretical and practical issues in heritage site management and conservation. Peer-reviewed papers from around the world report on new thinking and best practice in site management and conservation. Topics covered include: •Cultural, social, ethical and theoretical issues in archaeological site management and conservation •Site management •Historical documentation and condition reporting •Site deterioration and environmental monitoring •Preventative conservation, including reburial and protective sheltering of sites •Building materials analysis and treatment •Restoration and reconstruction of buildings •Visitor management and sustainable tourism •Site interpretation •National and international legislation and charters
期刊最新文献
Historical Irrigation Landscape Systems: Introducing Conservation, Management, and Reuse Experiences and Studies in Rural and Urban Contexts Editorial Introduction Irrigation: Qualities, Drawbacks, and Comparisons (In)adequacies of Heritage Conservation and Management: Socio-Spatial Contestations of the Piedmont-Scrublands, Ramanadi Basin, Tamirabarani Productive Landscape Ancestral Integrated Water Management Systems as Adaptation Tools for Climate Change: The “Acequias De Careo” and Historical Water Management of the Mecina River in Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1