A summary of the body of knowledge on physical activity for people following stroke: a scoping review

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2022.2102748
Claire McFeeters, K. Pedlow, N. Kennedy, H. Colquhoun, S. McDonough
{"title":"A summary of the body of knowledge on physical activity for people following stroke: a scoping review","authors":"Claire McFeeters, K. Pedlow, N. Kennedy, H. Colquhoun, S. McDonough","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2022.2102748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background There are challenges implementing physical activity interventions for people across the stroke pathway of care. There is a need to understand the intervention content in addition to the effects. Objective This scoping review maps out the existing systematic review evidence in relation to five objectives. Design Intervention data were extracted to identify and clarify definitions of physical activity as well as key emerging themes, gaps and recommendations for implementation approaches and consensus. Results 50 systematic reviews fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Most reviews (n = 31) focused on a subset of physical activity rather than day to day physical activity (n = 19). In addition, a description of theories underpinning the interventions were lacking. Only 11 reviews used a definition of physical activity. Physical activity outcome measures were reported in 22 reviews. Conclusions Better reporting of physical activity interventions is required to improve implementation. Research should include physical activity outcome measures across the stroke pathway. Determining which physical activity modes and parameters of each intervention would be useful in determining the optimal intervention for stroke survivors with different physical activity capacity levels.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2102748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background There are challenges implementing physical activity interventions for people across the stroke pathway of care. There is a need to understand the intervention content in addition to the effects. Objective This scoping review maps out the existing systematic review evidence in relation to five objectives. Design Intervention data were extracted to identify and clarify definitions of physical activity as well as key emerging themes, gaps and recommendations for implementation approaches and consensus. Results 50 systematic reviews fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Most reviews (n = 31) focused on a subset of physical activity rather than day to day physical activity (n = 19). In addition, a description of theories underpinning the interventions were lacking. Only 11 reviews used a definition of physical activity. Physical activity outcome measures were reported in 22 reviews. Conclusions Better reporting of physical activity interventions is required to improve implementation. Research should include physical activity outcome measures across the stroke pathway. Determining which physical activity modes and parameters of each intervention would be useful in determining the optimal intervention for stroke survivors with different physical activity capacity levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风患者体育活动知识体系综述:范围界定综述
摘要背景在整个中风护理过程中,为人们实施体育活动干预措施面临挑战。除了效果之外,还需要了解干预内容。目标本范围界定审查列出了与五个目标相关的现有系统审查证据。提取设计干预数据,以确定和澄清体育活动的定义,以及新出现的关键主题、差距和实施方法和共识的建议。结果50篇系统综述符合预定的纳入标准。大多数评论(n = 31)专注于身体活动的子集,而不是日常的身体活动(n = 19) 。此外,缺乏对支持干预措施的理论的描述。只有11篇评论使用了体育活动的定义。在22篇综述中报告了体育活动结果测量。结论需要更好地报告体育活动干预措施,以改进实施情况。研究应包括整个中风途径的体育活动结果测量。确定每种干预措施的哪些身体活动模式和参数将有助于确定具有不同身体活动能力水平的中风幸存者的最佳干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1