Správne trestanie na finančnom trhu (vybrané problémy trestania poriadkových deliktov subjektov finančného trhu)

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2022-12-09 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2022.48
Ľubomír Čunderlík
{"title":"Správne trestanie na finančnom trhu (vybrané problémy trestania poriadkových deliktov subjektov finančného trhu)","authors":"Ľubomír Čunderlík","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The submitted article concerns the topic of administrative punishment in the field of Slovak financial market regulations, placing emphasis on punishing the so-called “administrative procedural offences”. The article stems from the main hypothesis that the respective substantive legal regulation in the insurance sector in Slovakia, that is to say, the Slovak Insurance Act, allows the supervisory authority to impose sanctions for violations of a purely procedural nature (which – in effect – constitute administrative procedural offences), even in the decisions on merits. In the event that such hypothesis is confirmed, the author puts forward legal observations that should guide the supervisory authority towards the optimal choice of the sanctioning regime, i.e., to choose either to impose a procedural fine pursuant to procedural sanctioning provisions or to impose a meritorious sanction. At the same time, the aim of the article is to outline the differences in theory and practice between a substantive offence and a procedural offence and to highlight associated problematic areas of punishing procedural offences in the financial market.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The submitted article concerns the topic of administrative punishment in the field of Slovak financial market regulations, placing emphasis on punishing the so-called “administrative procedural offences”. The article stems from the main hypothesis that the respective substantive legal regulation in the insurance sector in Slovakia, that is to say, the Slovak Insurance Act, allows the supervisory authority to impose sanctions for violations of a purely procedural nature (which – in effect – constitute administrative procedural offences), even in the decisions on merits. In the event that such hypothesis is confirmed, the author puts forward legal observations that should guide the supervisory authority towards the optimal choice of the sanctioning regime, i.e., to choose either to impose a procedural fine pursuant to procedural sanctioning provisions or to impose a meritorious sanction. At the same time, the aim of the article is to outline the differences in theory and practice between a substantive offence and a procedural offence and to highlight associated problematic areas of punishing procedural offences in the financial market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提交的文章涉及斯洛伐克金融市场监管领域的行政处罚问题,重点是惩罚所谓的“行政程序犯罪”。这篇文章源于一个主要假设,即斯洛伐克保险部门各自的实质性法律法规,即《斯洛伐克保险法》,允许监管机构对纯粹程序性的违规行为(实际上构成行政程序性犯罪)实施制裁,即使是在根据案情作出的决定中也是如此。在这种假设得到证实的情况下,提交人提出了法律意见,这些意见应指导监督当局对制裁制度作出最佳选择,即选择根据程序性制裁规定处以程序性罚款,还是实施有根据的制裁。同时,本文的目的是概述实体犯罪和程序犯罪在理论和实践上的差异,并强调金融市场中惩罚程序犯罪的相关问题领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1