Children’s participation in practice: comparing the views of managers and practitioners in an early intervention and prevention programme

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Childrens Services Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1108/jcs-04-2021-0014
E. Tierney, Leonor Rodríguez, Danielle Kennan, C. Devaney, Bernadine Brady, J. Canavan, Cormac Forkan, A. Cassidy, P. Malone, Caroline McGregor
{"title":"Children’s participation in practice: comparing the views of managers and practitioners in an early intervention and prevention programme","authors":"E. Tierney, Leonor Rodríguez, Danielle Kennan, C. Devaney, Bernadine Brady, J. Canavan, Cormac Forkan, A. Cassidy, P. Malone, Caroline McGregor","doi":"10.1108/jcs-04-2021-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nParticipation is the active involvement of children and young people in decision-making regarding issues that affect their lives. It is crucial in the context of child protection and welfare systems and how they respond to the needs of children and young people. The purpose of this paper is to report on the evaluation of child and family participation in an early intervention and prevention programme implemented by the Irish Child and Family Agency. It provides an analysis of a comprehensive, “whole organization” approach to understand how participation is embedded in policy and practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper reports on a comparative qualitative case study of the perspectives of managers and practitioners about participation practice, identifying the facilitators and barriers, as well as their perspectives of the sustainability of participation within the agency and its partners. The authors draw on two complementary, theoretically informed studies evaluating participatory practice within the Agency using qualitative interviews with participants.\n\n\nFindings\nOverall, managers and practitioners had a positive attitude towards participation and identified examples of best practices. Facilitators included training, access to resources and the quality of relationships. Challenges for meaningful participation remain, such as the need to engage, hard to reach populations. Differences were identified regarding how embedded and sustainable participation was.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper provides a critical understanding of participation in practice and how to embed a culture of participation in child protection and welfare.\n","PeriodicalId":45244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcs-04-2021-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Participation is the active involvement of children and young people in decision-making regarding issues that affect their lives. It is crucial in the context of child protection and welfare systems and how they respond to the needs of children and young people. The purpose of this paper is to report on the evaluation of child and family participation in an early intervention and prevention programme implemented by the Irish Child and Family Agency. It provides an analysis of a comprehensive, “whole organization” approach to understand how participation is embedded in policy and practice. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports on a comparative qualitative case study of the perspectives of managers and practitioners about participation practice, identifying the facilitators and barriers, as well as their perspectives of the sustainability of participation within the agency and its partners. The authors draw on two complementary, theoretically informed studies evaluating participatory practice within the Agency using qualitative interviews with participants. Findings Overall, managers and practitioners had a positive attitude towards participation and identified examples of best practices. Facilitators included training, access to resources and the quality of relationships. Challenges for meaningful participation remain, such as the need to engage, hard to reach populations. Differences were identified regarding how embedded and sustainable participation was. Originality/value This paper provides a critical understanding of participation in practice and how to embed a culture of participation in child protection and welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童参与实践:比较早期干预和预防方案中管理人员和从业人员的观点
目的参与是指儿童和年轻人积极参与有关影响他们生活的问题的决策。这对于儿童保护和福利制度以及它们如何满足儿童和年轻人的需求至关重要。本文件的目的是报告对爱尔兰儿童和家庭机构实施的早期干预和预防方案中儿童和家庭参与情况的评估。它分析了一种全面的“整个组织”方法,以了解参与是如何融入政策和实践的。设计/方法论/方法本文报告了管理人员和从业者对参与实践的看法的比较定性案例研究,确定了促进者和障碍,以及他们对机构及其合作伙伴内参与可持续性的看法。作者利用了两项补充性的、理论上知情的研究,通过对参与者的定性访谈来评估原子能机构内的参与实践。调查结果总体而言,管理人员和从业人员对参与持积极态度,并确定了最佳做法的例子。调解人包括培训、获得资源和关系质量。有意义的参与仍然面临挑战,例如需要参与难以接触到的人群。与会者指出了参与的内在性和可持续性方面的差异。原创性/价值本文对参与实践以及如何将参与文化融入儿童保护和福利提供了批判性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
“Friendly, local and welcoming” – evaluation of a community mental health early intervention service From “intimate-insider” to “relative-outsider”: an autoethnographic account of undertaking social work research in one’s own “backyard” Effective child well-being practices, barriers and priority actions: survey findings from service providers and policymakers in 22 countries during COVID-19 Child First and the end of ‘bifurcation’ in youth justice? Why are there higher rates of children looked after in Wales?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1