{"title":"The Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Nationally Determined Contributions","authors":"Handa S. Abidin","doi":"10.1163/22131035-12010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe inclusion of explanations related to indigenous peoples (ip s) in Nationally Determined Contributions (ndc s) contributes to amplifying the harmony between climate change (cc) and the rights of ip s. The existence of ip s in ndc s explains and improves the position of ip s in their own states, and serves as a model for other parties to the Paris Agreement (pa). Nonetheless, not all parties to the pa mention and have the same standards in explaining the rights of ip s in their ndc s. There are different standards on whether or not the rights of ip s are included in ndc s, and there is also a disparity in the quality and quantity of explanations of the rights of ip s in ndc s. These differences occur in the ‘engagement form’ of Annex i of Decision 4/cma.1 or elsewhere in ndc s.","PeriodicalId":13730,"journal":{"name":"International Human Rights Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Human Rights Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-12010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The inclusion of explanations related to indigenous peoples (ip s) in Nationally Determined Contributions (ndc s) contributes to amplifying the harmony between climate change (cc) and the rights of ip s. The existence of ip s in ndc s explains and improves the position of ip s in their own states, and serves as a model for other parties to the Paris Agreement (pa). Nonetheless, not all parties to the pa mention and have the same standards in explaining the rights of ip s in their ndc s. There are different standards on whether or not the rights of ip s are included in ndc s, and there is also a disparity in the quality and quantity of explanations of the rights of ip s in ndc s. These differences occur in the ‘engagement form’ of Annex i of Decision 4/cma.1 or elsewhere in ndc s.
期刊介绍：
The International Human Rights Law Review (HRLR) is a bi-annual peer-reviewed journal. It aims to stimulate research and thinking on contemporary human rights issues, problems, challenges and policies. It is particularly interested in soliciting papers, whether in the legal domain or other social sciences, that are unique in their approach and which seek to address poignant concerns of our times. One of the principal aims of the Journal is to provide an outlet to human rights scholars, practitioners and activists in the developing world who have something tangible to say about their experiences on the ground, or in order to discuss cases and practices that are generally inaccessible to European and NorthAmerican audiences. The Editors and the publisher will work hands-on with such contributors to help find solutions where necessary to facilitate translation or language editing in respect of accepted articles. The Journal is aimed at academics, students, government officials, human rights practitioners, and lawyers working in the area, as well as individuals and organisations interested in the area of human rights law. The Journal publishes critical articles that consider human rights law, policy and practice in their various contexts, at global, regional, sub-regional and national levels, book reviews, and a section focused on an up-to-date appraisal of important jurisprudence and practice of the UN and regional human rights systems including those in the developing world.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
