A QUANTIFICATION AND IMPACT OF INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION USING RESIDUAL SYNTAX SCORE IN NSTEMI PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pakistan Heart Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421
Syed Waqar Ahmed, N. Rahman
{"title":"A QUANTIFICATION AND IMPACT OF INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION USING RESIDUAL SYNTAX SCORE IN NSTEMI PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION","authors":"Syed Waqar Ahmed, N. Rahman","doi":"10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of rSS after PCI for NSTEMI in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE (Major adverse cardiac event) at 3 years of follow-up. \nMethodology: A retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi between January 2016 and December 2016 was performed. 7 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to missing data (n=108). The SYNTAX scores before (baseline syntax=bSS) and after PCI (rSS) were calculated. Patients were stratified as CR if rSS =0, RICR if rSS >0 and ≤8 and ICR if rSS >8. \nResults: Patients that achieved CR were 44 (40.7%), RICR were 40 (37.7%) and ICR were 24 (22.2%). After three-year follow-up, ICR patients had the highest incidence of both all-cause mortality [(CR) 4.5% vs. (RICR) 5% vs. (ICR) 37.5% respectively; p<0.001] and major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) defined as composite of follow up cardiac death, MI and revascularization [(CR) 5% vs. (RICR) 10% vs. (ICR) 50% respectively; p<0.001]. There was no difference in the incidence of all-cause death (4.5% vs. 5%; p=0.92) or MACE (4.5% vs 10%, p=0.332) in patients with CR and ICR respectively (Table 1). \nTable 1: Outcomes at two years of follow-up according to residual SYNTAX score \nMACE- Major Adverse cardiac event (Cardiac death,MI or Revascularisation); CR- complete revascularization; RICR- Reasonable incomplete revascularization; ICR- Incomplete revascularization \n \n \n \n \n  \n \n \nCR (rSS=0) \nN= 44 \n \n \nRICR (rSS >0 and ≤8) \nN= 40 \n \n \nICR (rSS>8) \nN= 24 \n \n \nP value \n \n \nCR vs RICR \np value \n \n \nCR vs ICR \nP value \n \n \nRICR vs ICR \nP value \n \n \n \n \nAll cause death \n \n \n2 (4.5) \n \n \n2 (5) \n \n \n9 (37.5) \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.92 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n \n \nCardiac death \n \n \n1 (2.3) \n \n \n2 (5) \n \n \n7 (29.2) \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n0.50 \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n0.007 \n \n \n \n \nMI \n \n \n1 (2.3) \n \n \n1 (2.5) \n \n \n8 (33.3) \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.949 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.001 \n \n \n \n \nRevascularization \n \n \n1 (2.3) \n \n \n3 (7.5) \n \n \n3 (12.5) \n \n \n0.25 \n \n \n0.261 \n \n \n0.087 \n \n \n0.51 \n \n \n \n \nMACE \n \n \n2 (4.5) \n \n \n4 (10) \n \n \n12 (50) \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n0.332 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n<0.001 \n \n \n \n \nConclusion: The residual SYNTAX score (rSS) is a useful tool in quantifying incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI. ICR appears to confer a higher three-year mortality and MACE, however outcomes for RICR and CR were comparable. Hence the calculation of rSS in daily practice may also be used to determine a reasonable level of revascularization in patients where complete revascularization may not be possible.","PeriodicalId":42273,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55isupplement1.2421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of rSS after PCI for NSTEMI in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE (Major adverse cardiac event) at 3 years of follow-up. Methodology: A retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi between January 2016 and December 2016 was performed. 7 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to missing data (n=108). The SYNTAX scores before (baseline syntax=bSS) and after PCI (rSS) were calculated. Patients were stratified as CR if rSS =0, RICR if rSS >0 and ≤8 and ICR if rSS >8. Results: Patients that achieved CR were 44 (40.7%), RICR were 40 (37.7%) and ICR were 24 (22.2%). After three-year follow-up, ICR patients had the highest incidence of both all-cause mortality [(CR) 4.5% vs. (RICR) 5% vs. (ICR) 37.5% respectively; p<0.001] and major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) defined as composite of follow up cardiac death, MI and revascularization [(CR) 5% vs. (RICR) 10% vs. (ICR) 50% respectively; p<0.001]. There was no difference in the incidence of all-cause death (4.5% vs. 5%; p=0.92) or MACE (4.5% vs 10%, p=0.332) in patients with CR and ICR respectively (Table 1). Table 1: Outcomes at two years of follow-up according to residual SYNTAX score MACE- Major Adverse cardiac event (Cardiac death,MI or Revascularisation); CR- complete revascularization; RICR- Reasonable incomplete revascularization; ICR- Incomplete revascularization   CR (rSS=0) N= 44 RICR (rSS >0 and ≤8) N= 40 ICR (rSS>8) N= 24 P value CR vs RICR p value CR vs ICR P value RICR vs ICR P value All cause death 2 (4.5) 2 (5) 9 (37.5) <0.001 0.92 <0.001 0.001 Cardiac death 1 (2.3) 2 (5) 7 (29.2) 0.001 0.50 0.001 0.007 MI 1 (2.3) 1 (2.5) 8 (33.3) <0.001 0.949 <0.001 0.001 Revascularization 1 (2.3) 3 (7.5) 3 (12.5) 0.25 0.261 0.087 0.51 MACE 2 (4.5) 4 (10) 12 (50) <0.001 0.332 <0.001 <0.001 Conclusion: The residual SYNTAX score (rSS) is a useful tool in quantifying incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI. ICR appears to confer a higher three-year mortality and MACE, however outcomes for RICR and CR were comparable. Hence the calculation of rSS in daily practice may also be used to determine a reasonable level of revascularization in patients where complete revascularization may not be possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用残余语法评分对NSTEMI患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不完全血运重建的量化及影响
目的:本研究的目的是评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗NSTEMI后rSS在全因死亡率和3年随访时的MACE(主要心脏不良事件)方面的预后意义。方法:对2016年1月至2016年12月期间在卡拉奇阿加汗大学医院接受PCI的115名连续NSTEMI患者进行回顾性分析。7名患者因数据缺失而被排除在最终分析之外(n=108)。计算PCI前(基线语法=bSS)和PCI后(rSS)的语法得分。如果rSS=0,则将患者分为CR;如果rSS>0且≤8,则将RICR;如果rSS>8,则分为ICR。结果:CR 44例(40.7%)、RICR 40例(37.7%)、ICR 24例(22.2%),ICR患者的全因死亡率最高[(CR)4.5%对(RICR)5%对(ICR)37.5%;p0和≤8)N=40 ICR(rSS>8)N=24 P值CR对RICR P值CR对ICR P值RICR对ICR P值RICR比ICR P值全因死亡2(4.5)2(5)9(37.5)<0.001 0.92<0.001 0.001心脏死亡1(2.3)2(五)7(29.2)0.001 0.50 0.001 0.007 MI 1(2.3)1(2.5)8(33.3)<0.001 0.949<0.001 0.001血运重建1(2.3NSTEMI。ICR似乎会导致更高的三年死亡率和MACE,但RICR和CR的结果具有可比性。因此,在日常实践中,rSS的计算也可用于确定不可能完全血运重建的患者的合理血运重建水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Heart Journal
Pakistan Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Chart Review of the Head-Up Tilt Table Test at a Tertiary Care University Hospital Improving Quality Health Care Services by Implementing DMAIC Approach in Paediatric Cardiology Department of Public Hospital of Sindh, Pakistan: A Case Study Association of Body Mass Index with Peripheral Vascular Resistance Obesity from Clinical Evaluation to Management Local Perspective Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Cardiovascular Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1