Virtual Abolition: The Economic Lattice of Luwalo Forced Labor in the Uganda Protectorate

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY Pub Date : 2017-12-15 DOI:10.1353/AEH.2017.0006
O. Okia
{"title":"Virtual Abolition: The Economic Lattice of Luwalo Forced Labor in the Uganda Protectorate","authors":"O. Okia","doi":"10.1353/AEH.2017.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Luwalo was a type of \"traditional,\" unpaid forced labor used during the colonial period in the Uganda Protectorate until the mid-1940s. After the passage of the International Labour Organization's Forced Labor Convention in 1930, the British Colonial Office put pressure on the various colonial administrations to phase out forced labor. In Uganda the administration eventually abolished luwalo. With the looming prospect of abolition, the administration was forced to assess the monetary value of luwalo to better determine the scale of a new tax that would replace the labor. This paper examines this episode of forced labor abolition in the Uganda Protectorate to highlight two points regarding the use of unpaid traditional forced labor during the colonial era in Africa. First of all, although luwalo was construed as an artifact of tradition that was in some ways outside the market, the administration's own appraisal of luwalo showed that the unpaid labor actually served as an important revenue generation stream for the various local administrations within Uganda Protectorate, contributing tremendously to their base revenues. Secondly, despite the ideological and administrative effect of the Forced Labour Convention, the abolition of luwalo in Uganda shows that forced labor was not so much abolished as converted into an extractive tax. Even before abolition, the administration was, essentially, converting luwalo into a tax through the progressive extension of commutation payments paid by African males in order to avoid the work. With abolition, the administration simply made real what was already apparent by shifting the burden of the financial loss of luwalo onto the backs of Africans through a new Native Administration Tax. This virtual abolition of luwalo was a reflection of its economic importance.","PeriodicalId":43935,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AEH.2017.0006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AEH.2017.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Luwalo was a type of "traditional," unpaid forced labor used during the colonial period in the Uganda Protectorate until the mid-1940s. After the passage of the International Labour Organization's Forced Labor Convention in 1930, the British Colonial Office put pressure on the various colonial administrations to phase out forced labor. In Uganda the administration eventually abolished luwalo. With the looming prospect of abolition, the administration was forced to assess the monetary value of luwalo to better determine the scale of a new tax that would replace the labor. This paper examines this episode of forced labor abolition in the Uganda Protectorate to highlight two points regarding the use of unpaid traditional forced labor during the colonial era in Africa. First of all, although luwalo was construed as an artifact of tradition that was in some ways outside the market, the administration's own appraisal of luwalo showed that the unpaid labor actually served as an important revenue generation stream for the various local administrations within Uganda Protectorate, contributing tremendously to their base revenues. Secondly, despite the ideological and administrative effect of the Forced Labour Convention, the abolition of luwalo in Uganda shows that forced labor was not so much abolished as converted into an extractive tax. Even before abolition, the administration was, essentially, converting luwalo into a tax through the progressive extension of commutation payments paid by African males in order to avoid the work. With abolition, the administration simply made real what was already apparent by shifting the burden of the financial loss of luwalo onto the backs of Africans through a new Native Administration Tax. This virtual abolition of luwalo was a reflection of its economic importance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟废除:乌干达保护国卢瓦洛强迫劳动的经济格局
摘要:卢瓦洛(Luwalo)是一种“传统的”无薪强迫劳工,在乌干达保护国的殖民时期一直持续到20世纪40年代中期。1930年国际劳工组织《强迫劳动公约》通过后,英国殖民办事处向各殖民地政府施压,要求逐步停止强迫劳动。在乌干达,政府最终废除了卢瓦卢语。随着废除卢瓦罗税的前景日益逼近,政府被迫评估卢瓦罗的货币价值,以更好地确定取代劳动力的新税的规模。本文考察了乌干达保护国废除强迫劳动的这一事件,以突出在非洲殖民时代使用无偿传统强迫劳动的两点。首先,虽然卢瓦罗被认为是一种传统的人工制品,在某种程度上是在市场之外的,但政府自己对卢瓦罗的评估表明,无偿劳动实际上是乌干达保护国各个地方政府的重要收入来源,为他们的基本收入做出了巨大贡献。第二,尽管《强迫劳动公约》具有意识形态和行政方面的影响,但乌干达废除卢瓦罗表明,与其说是废除了强迫劳动,不如说是变成了一种采掘税。甚至在废除奴隶制之前,政府实质上已经通过逐步延长非洲男性为逃避劳动而支付的减刑金,将卢瓦罗转变为一种税。随着废除奴隶制度,政府通过征收新的土著行政税,将卢瓦罗人的经济损失转嫁到非洲人的背上,从而使已经很明显的事情成为现实。卢瓦罗的实际废除反映了它在经济上的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gendered Labor Relations in Colonial and Post-Colonial Eritrea The "Global Collaboratory on the History of Labour Relations": Putting Women's Labor and Labor Relations in Sub-Saharan Africa in a Global Context Women's Labor Relations in Sub-Saharan Africa and The Global South Compared, 1800–2000 Introduction From Subsistence Farmers To Guardians of Food Security and Well-Being: Shifts and Continuities in Female Labor Relations in Tanzania (1800–2000)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1