Conceptualising domestic servitude as a violation of the human right to housing and reframing Australian policy responses

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10383441.2022.2060650
Jessie Hohmann
{"title":"Conceptualising domestic servitude as a violation of the human right to housing and reframing Australian policy responses","authors":"Jessie Hohmann","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2022.2060650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article makes a twofold contribution to a human rights-centred response to domestic servitude as a modern form of slavery. First, it offers a conceptualisation of domestic servitude as a comprehensive and specific violation of the human right to housing, based on a reading of the right to housing as sitting at a crucial juncture of the public and private. Victims of domestic servitude experience a violation of the right to housing, the nature of which strikingly demonstrates both how housing sits at the nexus of the public and the private; and that the enjoyment of rights in both those spheres is crucial to a person’s experience of dignity, peace and security. This conceptualisation deepens our understanding of the right to housing, and the condition of domestic servitude as a violation of human rights. This article’s second aim is to demonstrate how the commitment to fulfilling the human right to housing underpins a better policy response to modern slavery in Australia. It opens a conversation on how a social rights-based response is one that would better serve victim/survivors, offering a more meaningful and targeted response to the harms they suffer.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2060650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article makes a twofold contribution to a human rights-centred response to domestic servitude as a modern form of slavery. First, it offers a conceptualisation of domestic servitude as a comprehensive and specific violation of the human right to housing, based on a reading of the right to housing as sitting at a crucial juncture of the public and private. Victims of domestic servitude experience a violation of the right to housing, the nature of which strikingly demonstrates both how housing sits at the nexus of the public and the private; and that the enjoyment of rights in both those spheres is crucial to a person’s experience of dignity, peace and security. This conceptualisation deepens our understanding of the right to housing, and the condition of domestic servitude as a violation of human rights. This article’s second aim is to demonstrate how the commitment to fulfilling the human right to housing underpins a better policy response to modern slavery in Australia. It opens a conversation on how a social rights-based response is one that would better serve victim/survivors, offering a more meaningful and targeted response to the harms they suffer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将家庭奴役概念化为对住房人权的侵犯,并重新制定澳大利亚的政策反应
摘要本文对以人权为中心应对家庭奴役这一现代奴隶制形式作出了双重贡献。首先,它将家庭奴役概念化为对住房人权的全面和具体侵犯,其基础是将住房权解读为处于公共和私人的关键时刻。家庭奴役的受害者经历了对住房权的侵犯,其性质惊人地表明,住房是如何处于公共和私人的关系中的;享受这两个领域的权利对一个人的尊严、和平与安全体验至关重要。这种概念化加深了我们对住房权的理解,以及将家庭奴役视为侵犯人权的情况。这篇文章的第二个目的是展示对实现住房人权的承诺如何支撑澳大利亚对现代奴隶制的更好政策回应。它开启了一场对话,探讨基于社会权利的应对措施如何更好地为受害者/幸存者服务,为他们所遭受的伤害提供更有意义和更有针对性的应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualising the crimes of Big Tech The current legal regime of the Indonesian outer small islands Mainstreaming climate change in legal education Skeletons in the cupboard: reading settler anxiety in Mabo and Love Post-enlargement (free) movement in the EU: who really counts as EU CITIZEN? understanding Dano through the lens of Orientalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1