Detecting Unusual Intravenous Infusion Alerting Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms.

Marian Obuseh, Denny Yu, P. DeLaurentis
{"title":"Detecting Unusual Intravenous Infusion Alerting Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms.","authors":"Marian Obuseh, Denny Yu, P. DeLaurentis","doi":"10.2345/1943-5967-56.2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo detect unusual infusion alerting patterns using machine learning (ML) algorithms as a first step to advance safer inpatient intravenous administration of high-alert medications.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nWe used one year of detailed propofol infusion data from a hospital. Interpretable and clinically relevant variables were feature engineered, and data points were aggregated per calendar day. A univariate (maximum times-limit) moving range (mr) control chart was used to simulate clinicians' common approach to identifying unusual infusion alerting patterns. Three different unsupervised multivariate ML-based anomaly detection algorithms (Local Outlier Factor, Isolation Forest, and k-Nearest Neighbors) were used for the same purpose. Results from the control chart and ML algorithms were compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe propofol data had 3,300 infusion alerts, 92% of which were generated during the day shift and seven of which had a times-limit greater than 10. The mr-chart identified 15 alert pattern anomalies. Different thresholds were set to include the top 15 anomalies from each ML algorithm. A total of 31 unique ML anomalies were grouped and ranked by agreeability. All algorithms agreed on 10% of the anomalies, and at least two algorithms agreed on 36%. Each algorithm detected one specific anomaly that the mr-chart did not detect. The anomaly represented a day with 71 propofol alerts (half of which were overridden) generated at an average rate of 1.06 per infusion, whereas the moving alert rate for the week was 0.35 per infusion.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThese findings show that ML-based algorithms are more robust than control charts in detecting unusual alerting patterns. However, we recommend using a combination of algorithms, as multiple algorithms serve a benchmarking function and allow researchers to focus on data points with the highest algorithm agreeability.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nUnsupervised ML algorithms can assist clinicians in identifying unusual alert patterns as a first step toward achieving safer infusion practices.","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/1943-5967-56.2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To detect unusual infusion alerting patterns using machine learning (ML) algorithms as a first step to advance safer inpatient intravenous administration of high-alert medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used one year of detailed propofol infusion data from a hospital. Interpretable and clinically relevant variables were feature engineered, and data points were aggregated per calendar day. A univariate (maximum times-limit) moving range (mr) control chart was used to simulate clinicians' common approach to identifying unusual infusion alerting patterns. Three different unsupervised multivariate ML-based anomaly detection algorithms (Local Outlier Factor, Isolation Forest, and k-Nearest Neighbors) were used for the same purpose. Results from the control chart and ML algorithms were compared. RESULTS The propofol data had 3,300 infusion alerts, 92% of which were generated during the day shift and seven of which had a times-limit greater than 10. The mr-chart identified 15 alert pattern anomalies. Different thresholds were set to include the top 15 anomalies from each ML algorithm. A total of 31 unique ML anomalies were grouped and ranked by agreeability. All algorithms agreed on 10% of the anomalies, and at least two algorithms agreed on 36%. Each algorithm detected one specific anomaly that the mr-chart did not detect. The anomaly represented a day with 71 propofol alerts (half of which were overridden) generated at an average rate of 1.06 per infusion, whereas the moving alert rate for the week was 0.35 per infusion. DISCUSSION These findings show that ML-based algorithms are more robust than control charts in detecting unusual alerting patterns. However, we recommend using a combination of algorithms, as multiple algorithms serve a benchmarking function and allow researchers to focus on data points with the highest algorithm agreeability. CONCLUSION Unsupervised ML algorithms can assist clinicians in identifying unusual alert patterns as a first step toward achieving safer infusion practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用机器学习算法检测异常静脉输液警报模式。
目的利用机器学习(ML)算法检测异常输液报警模式,以提高住院患者静脉给药的安全性。材料与方法我们使用了一家医院一年的异丙酚输注的详细数据。对可解释的和临床相关的变量进行特征设计,并按日历日汇总数据点。单变量(最大时限)移动范围(mr)控制图用于模拟临床医生识别异常输液报警模式的常用方法。三种不同的无监督多变量基于ml的异常检测算法(局部离群因子、隔离森林和k近邻)被用于相同的目的。比较了控制图和ML算法的结果。结果异丙酚数据有3300个输液报警,92%发生在白班,其中7个时限大于10。mr图确定了15个异常的警报模式。设置不同的阈值,以包括每个ML算法的前15个异常。共有31个独特的ML异常被分组并按亲和性排名。所有算法在10%的异常情况下达成一致,至少有两种算法在36%的异常情况下达成一致。每个算法都检测到一个特定的异常,而磁共振图没有检测到。异常代表一天71次异丙酚警报(其中一半被覆盖),平均每次输注1.06次,而一周的移动警报率为0.35次输注。这些发现表明,在检测异常报警模式方面,基于ml的算法比控制图更健壮。然而,我们建议使用算法的组合,因为多个算法服务于基准测试功能,并允许研究人员专注于具有最高算法一致性的数据点。结论:无监督ML算法可以帮助临床医生识别异常警报模式,作为实现更安全输液实践的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gamma and X-ray Irradiation on Polymers Commonly Used in Healthcare Products. Effect of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization on Nitinol. Toward Enhanced Machine-Based Release in X-ray Sterilization. Beyond Endoscopes: Pilot Study of Surgical Instrument Lumen Inspection. Advantages and Limitations of Physical and Virtual Dose Mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1