Comparing levels of geitonogamous visitation by honey bees and other pollinators

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Pollination Ecology Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.26786/1920-7603(2023)741
Dillon J. Travis, J. Kohn
{"title":"Comparing levels of geitonogamous visitation by honey bees and other pollinators","authors":"Dillon J. Travis, J. Kohn","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2023)741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geitonogamy, the transfer of pollen from one flower to another on the same plant, is often the primary means of self-pollination in flowering plants. For self-compatible plants, self-fertilization may lead to greatly reduced offspring fitness via inbreeding depression. For self-incompatible plants, geitonogamous pollen transfer can result in low seed set, even when stigmatic pollen loads are substantial. For multiple self-compatible, native California plants, we found that honey bees visited more flowers per plant than native insects, and that offspring resulting from pollination by honey bees had reduced fitness relative to those resulting from native insect pollination. Here we investigate whether honey bees generally make more geitonogamous visits than other pollinators using data from a global survey of 41 manuscripts that reported floral visitation data. Compared to the average of all non-honey bee visitors in a plants pollinator assemblage, honey bees visit significantly more flowers per plant, though they do not differ from the non-honey bee visitor with the highest rate of geitonogamous visitation. However, the disparity between rates of geitonogamous visitation by honey bees and non-honey bee visitors is a function of the frequency of honey bees relative to non-honey bee visitors. As honey bees become increasingly numerically dominant, there is a trend for their rates of geitonogamous visitation to increase, accompanied by a significant decline in flowers visited per plant by non-honey bee visitors. While we found that honey bees visited more flowers per plant compared to the average of other visitors, large or eusocial pollinators were as likely as honey bees to be the most geitonogamous visitor.","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2023)741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geitonogamy, the transfer of pollen from one flower to another on the same plant, is often the primary means of self-pollination in flowering plants. For self-compatible plants, self-fertilization may lead to greatly reduced offspring fitness via inbreeding depression. For self-incompatible plants, geitonogamous pollen transfer can result in low seed set, even when stigmatic pollen loads are substantial. For multiple self-compatible, native California plants, we found that honey bees visited more flowers per plant than native insects, and that offspring resulting from pollination by honey bees had reduced fitness relative to those resulting from native insect pollination. Here we investigate whether honey bees generally make more geitonogamous visits than other pollinators using data from a global survey of 41 manuscripts that reported floral visitation data. Compared to the average of all non-honey bee visitors in a plants pollinator assemblage, honey bees visit significantly more flowers per plant, though they do not differ from the non-honey bee visitor with the highest rate of geitonogamous visitation. However, the disparity between rates of geitonogamous visitation by honey bees and non-honey bee visitors is a function of the frequency of honey bees relative to non-honey bee visitors. As honey bees become increasingly numerically dominant, there is a trend for their rates of geitonogamous visitation to increase, accompanied by a significant decline in flowers visited per plant by non-honey bee visitors. While we found that honey bees visited more flowers per plant compared to the average of other visitors, large or eusocial pollinators were as likely as honey bees to be the most geitonogamous visitor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜜蜂和其他传粉昆虫的两性交配造访水平的比较
同种异体交配,即花粉从一朵花转移到同一株植物的另一朵花上,通常是开花植物自花授粉的主要手段。对于自交亲和植物,自交受精可能通过近交抑制而大大降低后代的适合度。对于自交不亲和的植物,即使在柱头花粉负荷很大的情况下,同种异体的花粉传递也会导致低结实率。对于多种自相容的加州原生植物,我们发现蜜蜂比本地昆虫每株花访问更多的花,并且蜜蜂授粉产生的后代相对于本地昆虫授粉产生的后代适应性降低。在这里,我们研究了蜜蜂是否通常比其他传粉者进行更多的授粉,使用了41份报告花访问数据的手稿的全球调查数据。与植物传粉者群体中所有非蜜蜂访花者的平均值相比,蜜蜂在每株植物上的访花次数明显更多,尽管它们与具有最高婚配访花率的非蜜蜂访花者没有区别。然而,蜜蜂和非蜜蜂访巢者访巢率之间的差异是蜜蜂相对于非蜜蜂访巢者频率的函数。随着蜜蜂在数量上越来越占主导地位,它们的同房拜访率有增加的趋势,同时伴随着非蜜蜂访花者对每株植物的访问量的显著下降。虽然我们发现,与其他访花者的平均水平相比,蜜蜂在每株植物上访问的花朵更多,但大型或群居传粉者与蜜蜂一样可能是最具同房性的访花者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pollinator effectiveness and pollination dependency of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in Swedish hemi-boreal forests Fecal sampling protocol to assess bumble bee health in conservation research Species-specific differences in bumblebee worker body size between different elevations: Implications for pollinator community structure under climate change Professor Sue Nicolson 1950-2023: Sweet solutions: pollinators and their physiology Flower-visiting lizards as key ecological actors for an endemic and critically endangered plant in the Canary Islands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1