What Is an Author?

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Critical Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/726273
Michael W. Clune
{"title":"What Is an Author?","authors":"Michael W. Clune","doi":"10.1086/726273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The twentieth century evolved several ways of treating literary authorship in terms of an object rather than a subject. One tradition, derived more or less distantly from late nineteenth century symbolism, identifies the source of authorship with the medium, the tradition, or language itself. Exponents of this view include writers as different as T. S. Eliot, Martin Heidegger, and Paul De Man. A second tradition, associated most closely with Michel Foucault, understands authorship in terms of impersonal social structures. Both of these traditions move the question of authorship from subject to object by bypassing the experience of the writer. I outline a third tradition, one that locates the movement from who to what within the experience of authorship itself. I enumerate key features of this model of authorship—which represents a revision of the classical concept of inspiration—through close readings of poems by Sylvia Plath and Jorie Graham.","PeriodicalId":48130,"journal":{"name":"Critical Inquiry","volume":"50 1","pages":"118 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The twentieth century evolved several ways of treating literary authorship in terms of an object rather than a subject. One tradition, derived more or less distantly from late nineteenth century symbolism, identifies the source of authorship with the medium, the tradition, or language itself. Exponents of this view include writers as different as T. S. Eliot, Martin Heidegger, and Paul De Man. A second tradition, associated most closely with Michel Foucault, understands authorship in terms of impersonal social structures. Both of these traditions move the question of authorship from subject to object by bypassing the experience of the writer. I outline a third tradition, one that locates the movement from who to what within the experience of authorship itself. I enumerate key features of this model of authorship—which represents a revision of the classical concept of inspiration—through close readings of poems by Sylvia Plath and Jorie Graham.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是作者?
20世纪出现了几种从客体而非主体的角度来看待文学创作的方法。有一种传统,或多或少来源于19世纪晚期的象征主义,将作者的来源与媒介、传统或语言本身联系起来。这种观点的倡导者包括t·s·艾略特、马丁·海德格尔和保罗·德曼等不同的作家。第二个传统与米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)联系最为密切,从非个人社会结构的角度来理解作者身份。这两种传统都绕过作者的经验,将作者身份的问题从主体转移到客体。我概述了第三个传统,这个传统把从“谁”到“什么”的运动定位在作者本身的经验中。我通过仔细阅读西尔维娅·普拉斯和乔里·格雷厄姆的诗歌,列举了这种作者模式的主要特征——它代表了对经典灵感概念的修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Inquiry
Critical Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Critical Inquiry has published the best critical thought in the arts and humanities since 1974. Combining a commitment to rigorous scholarship with a vital concern for dialogue and debate, the journal presents articles by eminent critics, scholars, and artists on a wide variety of issues central to contemporary criticism and culture. In CI new ideas and reconsideration of those traditional in criticism and culture are granted a voice. The wide interdisciplinary focus creates surprising juxtapositions and linkages of concepts, offering new grounds for theoretical debate. In CI, authors entertain and challenge while illuminating such issues as improvisations, the life of things, Flaubert, and early modern women"s writing.
期刊最新文献
Victorian Equations :Bread and Freedom: Egypt’s Revolutionary Situation The Draw of the Mark A Peripheral Vision: Framing the Cultural Bias in the Center of Photography :Apropos of Something: A History of Irrelevance and Relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1