Exploring Multi-touch Contact Size for Z-Axis Movement in 3D Environments

S. Holderness, Jared N. Bott, P. Wisniewski, J. Laviola
{"title":"Exploring Multi-touch Contact Size for Z-Axis Movement in 3D Environments","authors":"S. Holderness, Jared N. Bott, P. Wisniewski, J. Laviola","doi":"10.20380/GI2017.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine two methods for using relative contact size as an interaction technique for 3D environments on multi-touch capacitive touch screens. We refer to interpreting relative contact size changes as “pressure” simulation. We conducted a 2 x 2 within subjects experimental design using two methods for pressure estimation (calibrated and comparative) and two different 3D tasks (bidirectional and unidirectional). Calibrated pressure estimation was based upon a calibration session, whereas comparative pressure estimation was based upon the contact size of each initial touch. The bidirectional task was guiding a ball through a hoop, while the unidirectional task involved using pressure to rotate a stove knob. Results indicate that the preferred and best performing pressure estimation technique was dependent on the 3D task. For the bidirectional task, calibrated pressure performed significantly better, while the comparative method performed better for the unidirectional task. We discuss the implications and future research directions based on our findings.","PeriodicalId":93493,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","volume":"1 1","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2017.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we examine two methods for using relative contact size as an interaction technique for 3D environments on multi-touch capacitive touch screens. We refer to interpreting relative contact size changes as “pressure” simulation. We conducted a 2 x 2 within subjects experimental design using two methods for pressure estimation (calibrated and comparative) and two different 3D tasks (bidirectional and unidirectional). Calibrated pressure estimation was based upon a calibration session, whereas comparative pressure estimation was based upon the contact size of each initial touch. The bidirectional task was guiding a ball through a hoop, while the unidirectional task involved using pressure to rotate a stove knob. Results indicate that the preferred and best performing pressure estimation technique was dependent on the 3D task. For the bidirectional task, calibrated pressure performed significantly better, while the comparative method performed better for the unidirectional task. We discuss the implications and future research directions based on our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索3D环境中Z轴移动的多点触摸触点尺寸
在本文中,我们研究了两种使用相对接触尺寸作为多触点电容触摸屏三维环境交互技术的方法。我们把解释相对接触尺寸变化称为“压力”模拟。我们使用两种压力估计方法(校准和比较)和两种不同的3D任务(双向和单向)进行了2 x 2的受试者实验设计。校准压力估计是基于校准会话,而比较压力估计是基于每次初始触摸的接触尺寸。双向任务是引导一个球穿过一个箍,而单向任务是用压力旋转一个炉子旋钮。结果表明,首选和最佳的压力估计技术取决于三维任务。对于双向任务,校准压力的效果明显更好,而比较方法在单向任务中效果更好。根据研究结果,讨论了研究的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Enabling Blind People to Fill Out Paper Forms with a Wearable Smartphone Assistant. BayesGaze: A Bayesian Approach to Eye-Gaze Based Target Selection. Personal+Context navigation: combining AR and shared displays in network path-following Interactive Exploration of Genomic Conservation AffordIt!: A Tool for Authoring Object Component Behavior in Virtual Reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1