Arthroscopic treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a retrospective case series

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001161
R. Serri, Amir Farahanchi Baradaran, F. Mirzaee, Z. Zafarani, Hamidreza Aslani
{"title":"Arthroscopic treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a retrospective case series","authors":"R. Serri, Amir Farahanchi Baradaran, F. Mirzaee, Z. Zafarani, Hamidreza Aslani","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACJD) is a common shoulder injury that can be classified into six types using the Rockwood classification. Surgical management of type III ACJD remains controversial. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 36 patients who underwent surgical management of their type III ACJD using an arthroscopic technique with an EndoButton (Smith & Nephew, Watford, UK). Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years and assessed by University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score and radiographs. The average follow-up period was 3.8 yr (2 to 6 yr); all patients were between 20 and 65 yr old. Results: There was no recurrence of dislocation or subluxation. All patients reached a normal range of motion by the final follow-up. No significant pain was reported after the surgery. UCLA score improved to an average of 31.73±3.05 at final follow-up. Conclusions: The surgical management of type III ACJD with arthroscopic EndoButton fixation leads to satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication rate. Level of Evidence: Level IV.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"580 - 584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACJD) is a common shoulder injury that can be classified into six types using the Rockwood classification. Surgical management of type III ACJD remains controversial. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 36 patients who underwent surgical management of their type III ACJD using an arthroscopic technique with an EndoButton (Smith & Nephew, Watford, UK). Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years and assessed by University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score and radiographs. The average follow-up period was 3.8 yr (2 to 6 yr); all patients were between 20 and 65 yr old. Results: There was no recurrence of dislocation or subluxation. All patients reached a normal range of motion by the final follow-up. No significant pain was reported after the surgery. UCLA score improved to an average of 31.73±3.05 at final follow-up. Conclusions: The surgical management of type III ACJD with arthroscopic EndoButton fixation leads to satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication rate. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜治疗III型肩锁关节脱位:回顾性病例系列
背景:肩锁关节脱位(acromioclavular joint脱位,ACJD)是一种常见的肩部损伤,使用Rockwood分类可将其分为六种类型。III型ACJD的手术治疗仍有争议。方法:作者对36例采用EndoButton关节镜技术手术治疗III型ACJD的患者进行了回顾性分析(Smith & Nephew, Watford, UK)。患者随访至少2年,并通过加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部评分和x线片进行评估。平均随访时间为3.8年(2 ~ 6年);所有患者年龄在20 - 65岁之间。结果:无脱位或半脱位复发。所有患者在最后的随访中均达到了正常的活动范围。术后无明显疼痛。终期随访时UCLA评分提高至平均31.73±3.05分。结论:关节镜下EndoButton固定术治疗III型ACJD疗效满意,并发症发生率低。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1