Mobility and Secession in the Early Roman Republic*

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Antichthon Pub Date : 2017-10-26 DOI:10.1017/ann.2017.10
G. Bradley
{"title":"Mobility and Secession in the Early Roman Republic*","authors":"G. Bradley","doi":"10.1017/ann.2017.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One consequence of the globalisation of the modern world in recent years has been to focus historical interest on human migration and movement. Sociologists and historians have argued that mobility is much more characteristic of past historical eras than we might expect given our modern nationalistic perspectives. This paper aims to contribute to this subject by surveying some of the evidence for mobility in central Italy and by examining its implications for early Rome. I will focus primarily on the plebeian movement, which is normally seen in terms of an internal political dispute. Our understanding of the ‘Struggle of the Orders’ is conditioned by the idealising view of our literary sources, which look back on the early Republic from a period when the plebeians provided many of the key members of the nobility. However, if we see the plebeian movement in its contemporary central Italian context, it emerges as much more threatening and potentially subversive. The key plebeian tactic – secession from the state – is often regarded as little more than a military strike. Instead, I argue that it was a genuine threat to abandon the community, and secessions can be seen as ‘paused migrations’. This paper also considers two other episodes that support this picture, the migration to Rome of Attus Clausus and the Claudian gens and the proposed move to Veii by the plebs.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"51 1","pages":"149 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2017.10","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2017.10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract One consequence of the globalisation of the modern world in recent years has been to focus historical interest on human migration and movement. Sociologists and historians have argued that mobility is much more characteristic of past historical eras than we might expect given our modern nationalistic perspectives. This paper aims to contribute to this subject by surveying some of the evidence for mobility in central Italy and by examining its implications for early Rome. I will focus primarily on the plebeian movement, which is normally seen in terms of an internal political dispute. Our understanding of the ‘Struggle of the Orders’ is conditioned by the idealising view of our literary sources, which look back on the early Republic from a period when the plebeians provided many of the key members of the nobility. However, if we see the plebeian movement in its contemporary central Italian context, it emerges as much more threatening and potentially subversive. The key plebeian tactic – secession from the state – is often regarded as little more than a military strike. Instead, I argue that it was a genuine threat to abandon the community, and secessions can be seen as ‘paused migrations’. This paper also considers two other episodes that support this picture, the migration to Rome of Attus Clausus and the Claudian gens and the proposed move to Veii by the plebs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马共和国早期的流动性和分裂*
摘要近年来,现代世界全球化的一个后果是将历史兴趣集中在人类迁徙和迁徙上。社会学家和历史学家认为,鉴于我们现代的民族主义观点,流动性比我们预期的更具过去历史时代的特征。本文旨在通过调查意大利中部流动性的一些证据,并研究其对早期罗马的影响,为这一主题做出贡献。我将主要关注平民运动,这通常被视为内部政治争端。我们对“秩序的斗争”的理解受到我们文学来源的理想化观点的制约,这些文学来源回顾了共和国早期,当时平民提供了许多重要的贵族成员。然而,如果我们在当代意大利中部的背景下看待平民运动,它就会显得更具威胁性和潜在的颠覆性。平民的关键策略——脱离国家——通常被认为只不过是一次军事打击。相反,我认为放弃社区是一种真正的威胁,分裂可以被视为“暂停移民”。本文还考虑了支持这一观点的另外两个事件,即阿图斯·克劳斯和克劳迪亚氏族向罗马的迁移,以及平民向维伊的迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANN volume 57 Cover and Back matter ANN volume 57 Cover and Front matter ‘Slogans’ on Coins in Julius Caesar's Dictatorship Years (49–44 BC) Panaetius, Scipio Aemilianus, and the Man of Great Soul Remembering Someone Else's Past: The Social Psychology of Odysseus’ Fake Autobiographies (Od. 14 and 19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1