Role and Experience of a Subintensive Care Unit in Caring for Patients With COVID-19 in Italy: The CO-RESP Study

Abram
{"title":"Role and Experience of a Subintensive Care Unit in Caring for Patients With COVID-19 in Italy: The CO-RESP Study","authors":"Abram","doi":"10.12788/jcom.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This retrospective and prospective cohort study was designed to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) admitted to subintensive care units (SICU) and to identify the variables associated with outcomes. SICUs have been extremely stressed during the pandemic, but most data regarding critically ill COVID-19 patients come from intensive care units (ICUs). Studies about COVID-19 patients in SICUs are lacking. Setting and participants: The study included 88 COVID-19 patients admitted to our SICU in Cuneo, Italy, between March and May 2020. Measurements: Clinical and ventilatory data were collected, and patients were divided by outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analysis examined the variables associated with negative outcomes (transfer to the ICU, palliation, or death in a SICU). Results: A total of 60 patients (68%) had a positive outcome, and 28 patients (32%) had a negative outcome;69 patients (78%) underwent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Pronation (n=37 [42%]) had been more frequently adopted in patients who had a positive outcome vs a negative outcome (n=30 [50%] vs n=7 [25%];P=.048), and the median (interquartile range) Pao2 /Fio2 ratio after 6 hours of prone positioning was lower in patients who had a negative outcome vs a positive outcome (144 [140-168] vs 249 [195268], P=.006). Independent predictors of a negative outcome were diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 8.22;95% CI, 1.50-44.70;P=.015), higher D-dimer (OR, 1.28;95% CI, 1.04-1.57;P=.019), higher lactate dehydrogenase level (OR, 1.003;95% CI, 1.000-1.006;P=.039), and lower lymphocytes count (OR, 0.996;95% CI, 0.993-0.999;P=.004). Conclusion: SICUs have a fundamental role in the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19, who require longterm CPAP and pronation cycles. Diabetes, lymphopenia, and high D-dimer and LDH levels are associated with negative outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/jcom.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective and prospective cohort study was designed to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) admitted to subintensive care units (SICU) and to identify the variables associated with outcomes. SICUs have been extremely stressed during the pandemic, but most data regarding critically ill COVID-19 patients come from intensive care units (ICUs). Studies about COVID-19 patients in SICUs are lacking. Setting and participants: The study included 88 COVID-19 patients admitted to our SICU in Cuneo, Italy, between March and May 2020. Measurements: Clinical and ventilatory data were collected, and patients were divided by outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analysis examined the variables associated with negative outcomes (transfer to the ICU, palliation, or death in a SICU). Results: A total of 60 patients (68%) had a positive outcome, and 28 patients (32%) had a negative outcome;69 patients (78%) underwent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Pronation (n=37 [42%]) had been more frequently adopted in patients who had a positive outcome vs a negative outcome (n=30 [50%] vs n=7 [25%];P=.048), and the median (interquartile range) Pao2 /Fio2 ratio after 6 hours of prone positioning was lower in patients who had a negative outcome vs a positive outcome (144 [140-168] vs 249 [195268], P=.006). Independent predictors of a negative outcome were diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 8.22;95% CI, 1.50-44.70;P=.015), higher D-dimer (OR, 1.28;95% CI, 1.04-1.57;P=.019), higher lactate dehydrogenase level (OR, 1.003;95% CI, 1.000-1.006;P=.039), and lower lymphocytes count (OR, 0.996;95% CI, 0.993-0.999;P=.004). Conclusion: SICUs have a fundamental role in the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19, who require longterm CPAP and pronation cycles. Diabetes, lymphopenia, and high D-dimer and LDH levels are associated with negative outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利亚重症监护病房在照顾新冠肺炎患者中的作用和经验:CO-REP研究
目的:本回顾性和前瞻性队列研究旨在描述入住亚重症监护病房(SICU)的SARS-CoV-2感染(COVID-19)患者的特征、治疗和结局,并确定与结果相关的变量。疫情期间,重症监护病房承受着极大压力,但大多数关于COVID-19重症患者的数据来自重症监护病房(icu)。关于sicu中COVID-19患者的研究缺乏。环境和参与者:该研究包括2020年3月至5月期间在意大利库尼奥的SICU收治的88名COVID-19患者。测量方法:收集临床和通气数据,并按结果对患者进行分组。多变量logistic回归分析检查了与负面结果相关的变量(转入ICU、缓解或在SICU中死亡)。结果:60例(68%)患者出现阳性结果,28例(32%)患者出现阴性结果;69例(78%)患者接受了持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗。结果阳性的患者比结果阴性的患者更常采用内旋(n=37 [42%]) (n=30 [50%] vs n=7 [25%];P= 0.048),结果阴性的患者俯卧位6小时后Pao2 /Fio2比值中位数(四分位数范围)低于结果阳性的患者(144 [140-168]vs 249 [195268], P= 0.006)。阴性结果的独立预测因子为糖尿病(比值比[OR], 8.22;95% CI, 1.50-44.70;P= 0.015)、较高的d -二聚体(OR, 1.28;95% CI, 1.04-1.57;P= 0.019)、较高的乳酸脱氢酶水平(OR, 1.003;95% CI, 1.000-1.006;P= 0.039)和较低的淋巴细胞计数(OR, 0.996;95% CI, 0.993-0.999;P= 0.004)。结论:sicu在需要长期CPAP和旋前周期的COVID-19危重患者的治疗中具有基础性作用。糖尿病、淋巴细胞减少症、高d -二聚体和LDH水平与负面结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Glucagon Prescription Rates for Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Records Intervention Quality Improvement in Health Care: From Conceptual Frameworks and Definitions to Implementation The Hospitalist Triage Role for Reducing Admission Delays: Impacts on Throughput, Quality, Interprofessional Practice, and Clinician Experience of Care Redesign of Health Care Systems to Reduce Diagnostic Errors: Leveraging Human Experience and Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety in Transitions of Care: Addressing Discharge Communication Gaps and the Potential of the Teach-Back Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1