Cross-boundary weed management in protected area–centered ecosystems: how can it work and what makes it harder to achieve?

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Invasive Plant Science and Management Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1017/inp.2021.24
Natalie Otto, M. Brunson
{"title":"Cross-boundary weed management in protected area–centered ecosystems: how can it work and what makes it harder to achieve?","authors":"Natalie Otto, M. Brunson","doi":"10.1017/inp.2021.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Invasive species management in natural landscapes is generally executed at the scale of independent jurisdictions, yet the ecological processes and biodiversity to be protected from invasion occur over large spatial scales and across multiple jurisdictions. Jurisdictional land boundaries can influence the flows and dynamics of ecological systems, as well as the social systems that exist in these complex landscapes. Land management entities in large, protected area–centered ecosystems may use different approaches to address cross-boundary management challenges. To understand these differing strategies and their effects on cooperative invasive plant management, we interviewed employees with federal, county, and state agencies, research organizations, nonprofits, and local stakeholder groups in two national parks and their surrounding lands in California, USA. Although all participants stressed the importance of working together, they did so along a continuum of strategies ranging from simple communication to coordination of independent efforts to active collaboration. Barriers to collaboration can be categorized as originating within or externally to the management unit, including limited resources, differing agency priorities, paperwork requirements, and lack of support by higher-level managers. Strategies to reduce barriers depend on where they originate.","PeriodicalId":14470,"journal":{"name":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2021.24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Invasive species management in natural landscapes is generally executed at the scale of independent jurisdictions, yet the ecological processes and biodiversity to be protected from invasion occur over large spatial scales and across multiple jurisdictions. Jurisdictional land boundaries can influence the flows and dynamics of ecological systems, as well as the social systems that exist in these complex landscapes. Land management entities in large, protected area–centered ecosystems may use different approaches to address cross-boundary management challenges. To understand these differing strategies and their effects on cooperative invasive plant management, we interviewed employees with federal, county, and state agencies, research organizations, nonprofits, and local stakeholder groups in two national parks and their surrounding lands in California, USA. Although all participants stressed the importance of working together, they did so along a continuum of strategies ranging from simple communication to coordination of independent efforts to active collaboration. Barriers to collaboration can be categorized as originating within or externally to the management unit, including limited resources, differing agency priorities, paperwork requirements, and lack of support by higher-level managers. Strategies to reduce barriers depend on where they originate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以保护区为中心的生态系统的跨界杂草管理:它是如何工作的,是什么使它更难实现?
自然景观的入侵物种管理通常是在独立的管辖范围内进行的,而需要保护的生态过程和生物多样性则是在大的空间尺度和跨多个管辖范围内进行的。管辖范围内的土地边界可以影响生态系统的流动和动态,以及存在于这些复杂景观中的社会系统。在以保护区为中心的大型生态系统中,土地管理实体可以使用不同的方法来应对跨界管理挑战。为了了解这些不同的策略及其对合作性入侵植物管理的影响,我们在美国加利福尼亚州的两个国家公园及其周边地区采访了联邦、县和州机构、研究组织、非营利组织和当地利益相关者团体的员工。虽然所有与会者都强调合作的重要性,但他们是按照从简单沟通到协调独立努力再到积极合作的一系列战略进行合作的。协作的障碍可以分为源自管理单位内部或外部的障碍,包括有限的资源、不同的代理优先级、文书工作需求,以及缺乏高层管理人员的支持。减少壁垒的战略取决于壁垒的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Invasive Plant Science and Management (IPSM) is an online peer-reviewed journal focusing on fundamental and applied research on invasive plant biology, ecology, management, and restoration of invaded non-crop areas, and on other aspects relevant to invasive species, including educational activities and policy issues. Topics include the biology and ecology of invasive plants in rangeland, prairie, pasture, wildland, forestry, riparian, wetland, aquatic, recreational, rights-of-ways, and other non-crop (parks, preserves, natural areas) settings; genetics of invasive plants; social, ecological, and economic impacts of invasive plants and their management; design, efficacy, and integration of control tools; land restoration and rehabilitation; effects of management on soil, air, water, and wildlife; education, extension, and outreach methods and resources; technology and product reports; mapping and remote sensing, inventory and monitoring; technology transfer tools; case study reports; and regulatory issues.
期刊最新文献
A contractor comparison of novel IPT tools and techniques for Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolia) management Persistence of triclopyr, dicamba and picloram in the environment following aerial spraying for control of dense pine invasion Simulated Mechanical Control of Nitellopsis obtusa Under Mesocosm Conditions Morphological traits for rapid and simple separation of native and introduced common reed (Phragmites australis) INP volume 16 issue 2 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1