How a government panel on land reform in South Africa is stuck in old ways

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agrekon Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03031853.2021.1901750
T. Gran
{"title":"How a government panel on land reform in South Africa is stuck in old ways","authors":"T. Gran","doi":"10.1080/03031853.2021.1901750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The government Panel on land reform, headed by Dr. Vuyokazi Mahlati, presents an encompassing analysis of government programmes suggesting revised and new programmes to increase the speed of land reform. This note registers that improvement of local democracy is not a variable in the report. The note suggests that the Panel is stuck in old ways, in effect a centralised planning tradition and a heavily top down governing model. It suggests that developing local municipal and amakhosi democracy might seem a detour in land politics but might actually lead to a different and more effective land reform. Such land reform will favour more dignity, creativity and trust among people and a more fair modernisation of the South African economy.","PeriodicalId":55541,"journal":{"name":"Agrekon","volume":"60 1","pages":"80 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03031853.2021.1901750","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrekon","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2021.1901750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The government Panel on land reform, headed by Dr. Vuyokazi Mahlati, presents an encompassing analysis of government programmes suggesting revised and new programmes to increase the speed of land reform. This note registers that improvement of local democracy is not a variable in the report. The note suggests that the Panel is stuck in old ways, in effect a centralised planning tradition and a heavily top down governing model. It suggests that developing local municipal and amakhosi democracy might seem a detour in land politics but might actually lead to a different and more effective land reform. Such land reform will favour more dignity, creativity and trust among people and a more fair modernisation of the South African economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非土地改革政府小组如何陷入困境
摘要由Vuyokazi Mahlati博士领导的政府土地改革小组对政府计划进行了全面分析,提出了旨在加快土地改革速度的修订和新计划。本说明表明,地方民主的改善不是报告中的一个变量。该说明表明,该小组拘泥于旧的方式,实际上是一种集中的规划传统和自上而下的管理模式。这表明,发展地方市政和阿马霍西民主似乎是土地政治中的一条弯路,但实际上可能会导致一场不同的、更有效的土地改革。这样的土地改革将有利于提高人民的尊严、创造力和信任,并有利于南非经济更公平的现代化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrekon
Agrekon AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Agrekon publishes scholarly articles that contribute to the existing literature in the domain of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics as it applies to Southern Africa. The editors of Agrekon therefore invite contributions in this context that provide new insights, either through the problems they address, the methods they employ or the theoretical and practical insights gained from the results. The quarterly journal serves as the official publication of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA) and is published by Taylor & Francis.
期刊最新文献
Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study Modelling the exiting of South African producers from commercial agricultural production – an agent-based model The Covid pandemic, cultivation and livelihoods in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Agricultural productivity, land use intensification and rural household welfare: evidence from Ethiopia Is persistent “loadshedding” pulling the plug on agriculture in the Western Cape, South Africa?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1