A avaliação nacional da alfabetização (ANA) como política de avaliação para o ensino fundamental

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Foro de Educacion Pub Date : 2021-06-27 DOI:10.14516/FDE.776
Maria Joana Durbem Mareco, Walter Guedes Silva
{"title":"A avaliação nacional da alfabetização (ANA) como política de avaliação para o ensino fundamental","authors":"Maria Joana Durbem Mareco, Walter Guedes Silva","doi":"10.14516/FDE.776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil, the large scale educational assessment is part of school life, being used to rank schools or for the purpose of drawing an overview of the quality of education offered to children, possibilities that depend on the political context in which they are inserted and will provide direction for educational policies. The aim of this paper is to discuss the National Literacy Assessment (ANA) as a policy of assessment for elementary school, seeking to understand how this Policy guides the work developed in the classroom by the literacy teacher. For this, we considered authors that deal with the policies of large scale assessments and the results of these, in addition to guiding documents, ordinances, guides, plans, reports and normative related to ANA. Because it is not a procedural or diagnostic evaluation, ANA does not enable the immediate follow-up of students as occurs with Provinha Brasil, with a faster intervention and individualized results. However, its results point to an important diagnosis for the comprehension of the data, which are the social context indicators produced from the analysis of external factors, but which exert great influence on the literacy process of the students. The relationship established between the processes and the results achieved at the national, state and municipal levels, evidences the need for investigation of the relations that are produced between the instituted policies and the constitution of relative processes for the learning of all children in the literacy cycle.","PeriodicalId":43476,"journal":{"name":"Foro de Educacion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foro de Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14516/FDE.776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, the large scale educational assessment is part of school life, being used to rank schools or for the purpose of drawing an overview of the quality of education offered to children, possibilities that depend on the political context in which they are inserted and will provide direction for educational policies. The aim of this paper is to discuss the National Literacy Assessment (ANA) as a policy of assessment for elementary school, seeking to understand how this Policy guides the work developed in the classroom by the literacy teacher. For this, we considered authors that deal with the policies of large scale assessments and the results of these, in addition to guiding documents, ordinances, guides, plans, reports and normative related to ANA. Because it is not a procedural or diagnostic evaluation, ANA does not enable the immediate follow-up of students as occurs with Provinha Brasil, with a faster intervention and individualized results. However, its results point to an important diagnosis for the comprehension of the data, which are the social context indicators produced from the analysis of external factors, but which exert great influence on the literacy process of the students. The relationship established between the processes and the results achieved at the national, state and municipal levels, evidences the need for investigation of the relations that are produced between the instituted policies and the constitution of relative processes for the learning of all children in the literacy cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家识字评估(ANA)作为小学的评估政策
在巴西,大规模教育评估是学校生活的一部分,用于对学校进行排名或概述向儿童提供的教育质量,其可能性取决于其所处的政治背景,并将为教育政策提供指导。本文的目的是讨论国家识字评估(ANA)作为一项小学评估政策,试图了解该政策如何指导识字教师在课堂上开展的工作。为此,除了与ANA相关的指导文件、条例、指南、计划、报告和规范外,我们还考虑了处理大规模评估政策及其结果的作者。由于这不是一种程序性或诊断性评估,ANA无法像巴西普罗文哈那样立即对学生进行随访,从而获得更快的干预和个性化的结果。然而,它的结果为理解数据提供了一个重要的诊断,这些数据是通过分析外部因素产生的社会背景指标,但对学生的识字过程有很大影响。在国家、州和市各级建立的过程与取得的成果之间的关系证明,有必要调查制定的政策与制定识字周期中所有儿童学习的相关过程之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foro de Educacion
Foro de Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pedagogies of precariousness in the neoliberal educational order. Insecurity and recomposition of possibilities in the current political-pedagogical context Dificultades y desafíos de integración de los estudiantes venezolanos en Colombia desde la voz de sus docentes El papel de la educación para la prevención de violencias machistas. Estudio cualitativo en Lamu, Kenia La belleza ante el reto de educar para la sostenibilidad Conectividad e inclusión: el panorama argentino de la precariedad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1