Joah L. Williams, Madeleine M. Hardt, Aisling V. Henschel, Jasmine R. Jamison , Melissa J. Brymer, Alyssa A. Rheingold
{"title":"An Open Trial of Skills for Psychological Recovery for Sudden Loss Survivors","authors":"Joah L. Williams, Madeleine M. Hardt, Aisling V. Henschel, Jasmine R. Jamison , Melissa J. Brymer, Alyssa A. Rheingold","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sudden, unexpected death losses are among the most common traumatic experiences and place survivors at risk for a variety of bereavement-related mental health problems, including posttraumatic stress, depression, and prolonged grief reactions. Although survivors of sudden, unexpected deaths are most likely to seek support for emotional distress in the early aftermath of a loss, no early mental health interventions have specifically been evaluated for this vulnerable population. This study reports findings from an open trial of Skills for Psychological Recovery (SPR)—a brief, evidence-informed early intervention for trauma and bereaved survivors and their families—with a sample of 21 adult sudden loss survivors. Participants within 1 year of the sudden, unexpected death of a loved one received up to five sessions of SPR and completed self-report measures of mental health outcomes pre- and postintervention and again at 3-month follow-up. Results showed statistically significant reductions in posttraumatic stress, depression, and grief symptoms that were maintained at follow-up. A case description is provided to illustrate the use of SPR with this population. These findings suggest that SPR may be an acceptable, scalable early intervention for sudden loss survivors. Limitations, including lack of a comparison group and reliance on self-report measures, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722922001080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sudden, unexpected death losses are among the most common traumatic experiences and place survivors at risk for a variety of bereavement-related mental health problems, including posttraumatic stress, depression, and prolonged grief reactions. Although survivors of sudden, unexpected deaths are most likely to seek support for emotional distress in the early aftermath of a loss, no early mental health interventions have specifically been evaluated for this vulnerable population. This study reports findings from an open trial of Skills for Psychological Recovery (SPR)—a brief, evidence-informed early intervention for trauma and bereaved survivors and their families—with a sample of 21 adult sudden loss survivors. Participants within 1 year of the sudden, unexpected death of a loved one received up to five sessions of SPR and completed self-report measures of mental health outcomes pre- and postintervention and again at 3-month follow-up. Results showed statistically significant reductions in posttraumatic stress, depression, and grief symptoms that were maintained at follow-up. A case description is provided to illustrate the use of SPR with this population. These findings suggest that SPR may be an acceptable, scalable early intervention for sudden loss survivors. Limitations, including lack of a comparison group and reliance on self-report measures, are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.