Assessing Implementation Fidelity in a Community Health Improvement Plan

D. Tataw, Olugbemiga Tanilèpadàkunday
{"title":"Assessing Implementation Fidelity in a Community Health Improvement Plan","authors":"D. Tataw, Olugbemiga Tanilèpadàkunday","doi":"10.47779/ajhs.2020.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes and analyzes a pre-post non-experimental process evaluation in a Community Health Improvement Plan and the building of evidence for program improvement in the Plan, Do, Check and Act (PDCA) continuous improvement cycle with a focus on the Check and Act steps. The findings will help stakeholders to gain insight into plan implementation and consider necessary design and process adjustments. An overall mean completion rate of 60.44% was recorded with achievement scores ranging from 0% (goals 4 and 5) to 87.92% (goal 1). At the mid-point of implementation, completion for each priority issue was as follows: completion and fidelity rates for action steps addressing healthy behaviors priority issue was 78.05%, the implementation rate for action steps addressing Health Care Capacity, Access, and Delivery priority issue was 43.38%; and the completion rate for action steps addressing changes in policy systems, environment priority issue was at 50%. The level of implementation completion for each priority issue and corresponding action steps aligns with the degree of issue complexity predicted in the conceptual framework. These patterns suggest that initiatives that addressed fundamental causes of poor health status are harder to implement as evidenced by lower completion and fidelity rates.","PeriodicalId":88360,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47779/ajhs.2020.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper describes and analyzes a pre-post non-experimental process evaluation in a Community Health Improvement Plan and the building of evidence for program improvement in the Plan, Do, Check and Act (PDCA) continuous improvement cycle with a focus on the Check and Act steps. The findings will help stakeholders to gain insight into plan implementation and consider necessary design and process adjustments. An overall mean completion rate of 60.44% was recorded with achievement scores ranging from 0% (goals 4 and 5) to 87.92% (goal 1). At the mid-point of implementation, completion for each priority issue was as follows: completion and fidelity rates for action steps addressing healthy behaviors priority issue was 78.05%, the implementation rate for action steps addressing Health Care Capacity, Access, and Delivery priority issue was 43.38%; and the completion rate for action steps addressing changes in policy systems, environment priority issue was at 50%. The level of implementation completion for each priority issue and corresponding action steps aligns with the degree of issue complexity predicted in the conceptual framework. These patterns suggest that initiatives that addressed fundamental causes of poor health status are harder to implement as evidenced by lower completion and fidelity rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估社区健康改善计划实施的保真度
本文描述并分析了社区健康改善计划中的前后非实验过程评估,以及计划、执行、检查和行动(PDCA)持续改进周期中项目改进的证据构建,重点关注检查和行动步骤。这些发现将帮助利益相关者深入了解计划的实施,并考虑必要的设计和过程调整。总体平均完成率为60.44%,成就得分范围从0%(目标4和5)到87.92%(目标1)。在实施的中点,每个优先问题的完成率和保真率如下:解决健康行为优先问题的行动步骤的完成率和保真率为78.05%,解决卫生保健能力、可及性和交付优先问题的行动步骤的执行率为43.38%;解决政策体系变化、环境优先问题的行动步骤完成率为50%。每个优先问题和相应行动步骤的执行完成程度与概念框架中预测的问题复杂程度一致。这些模式表明,解决健康状况不佳根本原因的举措更难实施,完成率和保真率较低就是证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographic Coterminous of COVID-19 Case and Vaccination Centers in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana Factors Associated with Condom Use among Community College Students Symptom Screenings and Surveillance Testing for COVID-19 in University Athletes Exploring Career Motivations and Concerns of Registered Nurses in New York State Exploring the Motivations of Nursing Students in New York State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1