A Single Supplier Multi Buyer Supply Chain Coordination under Vendor- managed Inventory: Ensuring Buyers’ Interests in a Decentralized Setting

Abhishek Chakraborty, Nishant Kumar Verma, A. Chatterjee
{"title":"A Single Supplier Multi Buyer Supply Chain Coordination under Vendor- managed Inventory: Ensuring Buyers’ Interests in a Decentralized Setting","authors":"Abhishek Chakraborty, Nishant Kumar Verma, A. Chatterjee","doi":"10.1177/22779752211072934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our work delves into supply chain coordination involving a single supplier selling a single product to multiple downstream buyers. We consider the case when the supplier proposes implementing vendor-managed inventory (VMI) for each buyer. The VMI contract involves the buyers charging a penalty to the supplier on the excess inventory whenever the supplier exceeds some pre-decided inventory threshold. Unlike the works covered predominantly in the VMI literature involving penalty, where both the penalty and the threshold are exogenous, we develop a model to determine both endogenously. In our study, the supplier deciding on the penalty and the inventory threshold needs to ensure that each of the buyers’ interests is protected, that is, none of the buyers becomes worse off from the optimal position, thereby ensuring the willing participation of all the buyers. We further compared our model with the centralized Joint Economic Lot Size (JELS) model and other existing models. We show that our model has a cost equivalence with the JELS model with unequal order intervals. We also show the superiority of our proposed model over the existing VMI models in terms of the overall costs. Finally, we examine the impact of size and ordering cost on each buyers’ costs through numerical analysis.","PeriodicalId":43330,"journal":{"name":"IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22779752211072934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Our work delves into supply chain coordination involving a single supplier selling a single product to multiple downstream buyers. We consider the case when the supplier proposes implementing vendor-managed inventory (VMI) for each buyer. The VMI contract involves the buyers charging a penalty to the supplier on the excess inventory whenever the supplier exceeds some pre-decided inventory threshold. Unlike the works covered predominantly in the VMI literature involving penalty, where both the penalty and the threshold are exogenous, we develop a model to determine both endogenously. In our study, the supplier deciding on the penalty and the inventory threshold needs to ensure that each of the buyers’ interests is protected, that is, none of the buyers becomes worse off from the optimal position, thereby ensuring the willing participation of all the buyers. We further compared our model with the centralized Joint Economic Lot Size (JELS) model and other existing models. We show that our model has a cost equivalence with the JELS model with unequal order intervals. We also show the superiority of our proposed model over the existing VMI models in terms of the overall costs. Finally, we examine the impact of size and ordering cost on each buyers’ costs through numerical analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应商管理库存下的单供应商多买方供应链协调:分散环境下的买方利益保障
我们的工作深入研究了供应链协调,涉及单个供应商向多个下游买家销售单个产品。我们考虑供应商建议为每个买家实施供应商管理库存(VMI)的情况。VMI合同涉及到,每当供应商超过某个预先决定的库存阈值时,买方就向供应商收取超额库存的罚款。与VMI文献中主要涉及惩罚的工作不同,其中惩罚和阈值都是外生的,我们开发了一个模型来内生地确定两者。在我们的研究中,决定罚款和库存阈值的供应商需要确保每个买家的利益都得到保护,也就是说,没有一个买家从最佳位置变得更糟,从而确保所有买家的自愿参与。我们进一步将我们的模型与集中式联合经济批量(JELS)模型和其他现有模型进行了比较。我们证明了我们的模型与具有不等阶区间的JELS模型具有成本等价性。我们还展示了我们提出的模型在总体成本方面优于现有的VMI模型。最后,我们通过数值分析考察了规模和订购成本对每个买家成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
31.20%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Fintech Innovation Adoption in the Digital Payments Landscape Amidst the Pandemic: Empirical Evidence and Future Outlook Do Tragic Events Make Investors More Pro-social? Evidence from Japan Alliance or Association? Exploring the Effect of Work–Family Balance on Workplace Well-being, and the Mediating Effect of Work Attitudes Do Retail Evolution Theories Explain Wholesalers’ Responses in Emerging Economies? Evidence from a Wholesale Market in Northern India Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1