Evaluating the accrual anomaly in the Chinese stock market with the decomposition method

IF 3.7 Q1 ECONOMICS China Economic Journal Pub Date : 2020-02-18 DOI:10.1080/17538963.2020.1726601
Zhuo Huang, Zhimin Qiu, Dawei Lin
{"title":"Evaluating the accrual anomaly in the Chinese stock market with the decomposition method","authors":"Zhuo Huang, Zhimin Qiu, Dawei Lin","doi":"10.1080/17538963.2020.1726601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We evaluate the explanations for accrual anomaly in the Chinese stock market using the decomposition method. The results show that institutional ownership best explains the accrual anomaly with an explanatory power of about 46%, equity growth (EG) explains 12% of the anomaly, and the residual fraction of around 32% is unexplained by any candidate explanations. Our findings indicate that the naïve investor fixation hypothesis is favored to explain the accrual anomaly in China, and the existing explanations cannot fully explain the anomaly.","PeriodicalId":45279,"journal":{"name":"China Economic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538963.2020.1726601","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2020.1726601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT We evaluate the explanations for accrual anomaly in the Chinese stock market using the decomposition method. The results show that institutional ownership best explains the accrual anomaly with an explanatory power of about 46%, equity growth (EG) explains 12% of the anomaly, and the residual fraction of around 32% is unexplained by any candidate explanations. Our findings indicate that the naïve investor fixation hypothesis is favored to explain the accrual anomaly in China, and the existing explanations cannot fully explain the anomaly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用分解法评估中国股票市场的应计异常
摘要本文运用分解方法对中国股票市场应计收益异常的解释进行了评价。结果表明,机构所有权最能解释应计异常,解释力约为46%,股权增长(EG)解释了12%的异常,剩余部分约32%无法被任何候选解释解释。研究结果表明,naïve投资者固定假说更倾向于解释中国的应计收益异常,现有的解释不能完全解释中国的应计收益异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Long-term effect of trade liberalization on human capital: evidence from Chinese students The institutional improvement effects of China’s foreign infrastructure investment and its mechanisms: implications for the construction of the belt and road initiative A decade of the belt and road initiative and its global impact Belt and Road countries’ external debt and China’s new strategies Financial sector development and industrialization: lessons and prospects for Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1