Activity profile of training and matches in Brazilian Olympic female soccer team

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Science and Medicine in Football Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1080/24733938.2019.1615120
Guilherme Passos Ramos, N. Datson, F. Mahseredjian, T. R. Lopes, C. Coimbra, L. Prado, F. Nakamura, E. Penna
{"title":"Activity profile of training and matches in Brazilian Olympic female soccer team","authors":"Guilherme Passos Ramos, N. Datson, F. Mahseredjian, T. R. Lopes, C. Coimbra, L. Prado, F. Nakamura, E. Penna","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2019.1615120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This study compared the activity profile of different types of soccer-specific training activity with the demands of competitive international female match-play. Methods: Twenty-one female players from the Brazilian National Soccer Team were monitored in twenty-two on-field training sessions during the 30-day preparatory training camp prior to the 2016 Olympic Games. Activities were categorized into warmup (WU), small sided games (SSG), technical and tactical training (TTT) and friendly matches (FM). The activity profile in each type of drill was then compared to the ones of the 6 matches performed during the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. Results: It was found that distance traveled at different speeds were higher during matches compared to WU, SSG, and TTT, but not compared to FM. Frequency of accelerations was similar between matches and TTT, SSG and FM. Repeated acceleration and sprints were higher during Matches compared to WU, TTT, SSG but FM presented similar results. Conclusion: It was concluded that although there were different acceleration and deceleration demands amongst WU, SSG and TTT compared to match-play, FM was the only training activity which consistently replicated or exceeded Olympic matches’ physical demands.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"3 1","pages":"231 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2019.1615120","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2019.1615120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study compared the activity profile of different types of soccer-specific training activity with the demands of competitive international female match-play. Methods: Twenty-one female players from the Brazilian National Soccer Team were monitored in twenty-two on-field training sessions during the 30-day preparatory training camp prior to the 2016 Olympic Games. Activities were categorized into warmup (WU), small sided games (SSG), technical and tactical training (TTT) and friendly matches (FM). The activity profile in each type of drill was then compared to the ones of the 6 matches performed during the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. Results: It was found that distance traveled at different speeds were higher during matches compared to WU, SSG, and TTT, but not compared to FM. Frequency of accelerations was similar between matches and TTT, SSG and FM. Repeated acceleration and sprints were higher during Matches compared to WU, TTT, SSG but FM presented similar results. Conclusion: It was concluded that although there were different acceleration and deceleration demands amongst WU, SSG and TTT compared to match-play, FM was the only training activity which consistently replicated or exceeded Olympic matches’ physical demands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西奥运女足训练与比赛活动概况
摘要目的:本研究比较了不同类型足球专项训练活动的活动特征与国际女子竞技比赛的需求。方法:在2016年奥运会前30天的备战训练营中,对巴西国家足球队21名女球员进行22次现场训练监测。活动分为热身赛(WU)、小型比赛(SSG)、技战术训练(TTT)和友谊赛(FM)。然后将每种演练的活动概况与2016年里约热内卢奥运会期间进行的6场比赛的活动概况进行比较。结果:与WU、SSG和TTT相比,在比赛中以不同速度行进的距离更高,而与FM相比则没有。比赛与TTT、SSG和FM之间的加速频率相似。与WU、TTT和SSG相比,比赛期间的重复加速和冲刺次数更高,但FM的结果相似。结论:虽然WU、SSG和TTT的加减速需求与对抗赛相比有所不同,但FM是唯一能够持续复制或超过奥运比赛身体需求的训练活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Measures of (injury and illness) occurrence: a primer on epidemiological concepts and terminology for authors. The maturity status but not the relative age influences elite young football players’ physical performance Inter-methodological quantification of the target change for performance test outcomes relevant to elite female soccer players Author reply to Weaving et al.: comment on: ‘A contemporary multi-modal mechanical approach to training monitoring in elite professional soccer: a mathematical problem?’ The influence of relative playing area and player numerical imbalance on physical and perceptual demands in soccer small-sided game formats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1