More than storage of information: What working memory contributes to visual abductive reasoning

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.31234/OSF.IO/42QYF
Anja Klichowicz, Agnes Rosner, J. Krems
{"title":"More than storage of information: What working memory contributes to visual abductive reasoning","authors":"Anja Klichowicz, Agnes Rosner, J. Krems","doi":"10.31234/OSF.IO/42QYF","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abductive reasoning is the process of finding the best explanation for a set of observations. As the number of possible observations and corresponding explanations may be very high, it is commonly accepted that the capacity of working memory is closely related to successful abductive reasoning. However, the precise relationship between reasoning and working memory capacity remains largely opaque. In a reanalysis of two experiments (N = 59), we first investigated whether reasoning performance differs due to differences in working memory capacity. Second, using eye tracking, we explored the relationship between the facets of working memory and the process of visuospatial reasoning. We used working memory tests of both components (verbal-numerical/spatial) as well as an intelligence measure. Results show a clear relationship between reasoning accuracy and spatial storage components as well as intelligence. Process measures suggest that high working memory ability might lead to the use of strategies to optimize the content and complexity of the mental representation on which abductive reasoning is based. Results are discussed in relation to current theories and the existing literature on the effects of memory on eye movements.","PeriodicalId":51754,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/42QYF","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abductive reasoning is the process of finding the best explanation for a set of observations. As the number of possible observations and corresponding explanations may be very high, it is commonly accepted that the capacity of working memory is closely related to successful abductive reasoning. However, the precise relationship between reasoning and working memory capacity remains largely opaque. In a reanalysis of two experiments (N = 59), we first investigated whether reasoning performance differs due to differences in working memory capacity. Second, using eye tracking, we explored the relationship between the facets of working memory and the process of visuospatial reasoning. We used working memory tests of both components (verbal-numerical/spatial) as well as an intelligence measure. Results show a clear relationship between reasoning accuracy and spatial storage components as well as intelligence. Process measures suggest that high working memory ability might lead to the use of strategies to optimize the content and complexity of the mental representation on which abductive reasoning is based. Results are discussed in relation to current theories and the existing literature on the effects of memory on eye movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不仅仅是信息存储:工作记忆对视觉溯因推理的贡献
溯因推理是为一系列观察结果寻找最佳解释的过程。由于可能的观察结果和相应的解释可能非常多,因此人们普遍认为工作记忆的能力与成功的溯因推理密切相关。然而,推理和工作记忆容量之间的确切关系在很大程度上仍然不清楚。在对两个实验(N = 59)的再分析中,我们首先调查了推理表现是否因工作记忆容量的差异而不同。其次,通过眼动追踪,我们探索了工作记忆的各个方面与视觉空间推理过程之间的关系。我们使用了工作记忆测试(语言-数字/空间)和智力测试。结果表明,推理精度与空间存储成分和智力之间存在明显的关系。过程测量表明,高工作记忆能力可能导致使用策略来优化溯因推理所基于的心理表征的内容和复杂性。结果讨论了有关记忆对眼球运动的影响的现有理论和文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Cognitive Psychology
Advances in Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coronavirus Anxiety as Mediator in the Relationship of Depression and Fear of Death among Polish Adults in the Second Half of Life Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure Sensory Overlap for Specific Memories Only Matters for Poor Memory Traces The Influence of Fit Between Regulatory Focus and Decision-Making Strategies on Moral Judgment The Two-Factor Structure of Cognitive Flexibility: Tempo of Switching and Overcoming of Prepotent Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1