The elephant in the room called ‘skin type IV’: ‘Südländer’ (Southerner) as a discriminatory category in German police reports

IF 0.5 2区 社会学 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1080/0031322X.2023.2205690
Clara Ervedosa
{"title":"The elephant in the room called ‘skin type IV’: ‘Südländer’ (Southerner) as a discriminatory category in German police reports","authors":"Clara Ervedosa","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2023.2205690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ervedosa’s article demonstrates from a cultural perspective that the categories ‘Südländer’ (Southerner) and ‘südländisches Aussehen’ (Southern looks) in German police reports are discriminatory since they challenge the central principles of the German constitution. They infringe the fundamental right in Article 3.3, that is, the right not to be racially discriminated against, the fundamental rights of human dignity (Article 1.1) and human equality (Article 3.1), as well as the constitutional right to be a German citizen regardless of one’s skin colour (Article 116). It argues that the terms are a form of skin-colour racism in that the police carry out their work—investigations, searches, inquiries and so on—on the basis of the perpetrator’s racialized phenotype. The categories basically stand for ‘Mediterranean looks’—even referred to in the past as the ‘Mediterranean race’—and phenotype: dark hair, dark eyes and so-called ‘skin type IV’, that is, ‘olive or brown skin’. They are the product of a tradition of racialized, exclusionary thinking that collides with the humanistic and democratic values of the Grundgesetz (Basic Law).","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":"56 1","pages":"123 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns of Prejudice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2023.2205690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ervedosa’s article demonstrates from a cultural perspective that the categories ‘Südländer’ (Southerner) and ‘südländisches Aussehen’ (Southern looks) in German police reports are discriminatory since they challenge the central principles of the German constitution. They infringe the fundamental right in Article 3.3, that is, the right not to be racially discriminated against, the fundamental rights of human dignity (Article 1.1) and human equality (Article 3.1), as well as the constitutional right to be a German citizen regardless of one’s skin colour (Article 116). It argues that the terms are a form of skin-colour racism in that the police carry out their work—investigations, searches, inquiries and so on—on the basis of the perpetrator’s racialized phenotype. The categories basically stand for ‘Mediterranean looks’—even referred to in the past as the ‘Mediterranean race’—and phenotype: dark hair, dark eyes and so-called ‘skin type IV’, that is, ‘olive or brown skin’. They are the product of a tradition of racialized, exclusionary thinking that collides with the humanistic and democratic values of the Grundgesetz (Basic Law).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
房间里的大象称“皮肤类型IV”:“Südländer”(南方人)是德国警方报告中的歧视类别
Ervedosa的文章从文化角度论证了德国警方报告中的“Südländer”(南方人)和“südländisches Aussehen”(南方人)这两个类别具有歧视性,因为它们挑战了德国宪法的核心原则。它们侵犯了第3.3条的基本权利,即不受种族歧视的权利、人的尊严的基本权利(第1.1条)和人的平等的基本权利(第3.1条),以及不论肤色都是德国公民的宪法权利(第116条)。它认为,这些术语是肤色种族主义的一种形式,因为警察根据犯罪者的种族化表型进行工作——调查、搜查、询问等等。这些分类基本上代表了“地中海长相”——甚至在过去被称为“地中海种族”——和表现型:深色头发、深色眼睛和所谓的“第四种肤色”,即“橄榄色或棕色皮肤”。它们是种族化、排他性思维传统的产物,与《基本法》(Grundgesetz)的人文和民主价值观相冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Patterns of Prejudice provides a forum for exploring the historical roots and contemporary varieties of social exclusion and the demonization or stigmatisation of the Other. It probes the language and construction of "race", nation, colour, and ethnicity, as well as the linkages between these categories. It encourages discussion of issues at the top of the public policy agenda, such as asylum, immigration, hate crimes and citizenship. As none of these issues are confined to any one region, Patterns of Prejudice maintains a global optic, at the same time as scrutinizing intensely the history and development of intolerance and chauvinism in the United States and Europe, both East and West.
期刊最新文献
When antisemitism and philosemitism go hand in hand: attitudes to Jews in contemporary East Asia Distracted by the far right Racial warfare in German women’s colonial memoirs The Jewish ‘monopoly’ of the slave trade in the early Middle Ages: the origins of an enduring historical motif Anti-Muslim tribalism: a new framework for analysing Islamophobia in contemporary times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1