Evolutive (Dynamic) Interpretation and Informal Modification of Constituent Instruments of International Organizations

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Chinese Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1093/chinesejil/jmad019
R. Etinski
{"title":"Evolutive (Dynamic) Interpretation and Informal Modification of Constituent Instruments of International Organizations","authors":"R. Etinski","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmad019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Induced by the work of the Institute of International Law on the limits to evolutive (dynamic) interpretation of constituent instruments of international organizations, the author discusses the issues of evolutive and dynamic interpretation, limits to the interpretation, legitimacy of informal modification of constituent instruments and borderline between interpretation and informal modification. He will propose conditions under which an informal modification may be legitimate. In spite of the fact that the borderline between interpretation and informal modification cannot be precisely located, the author will refer to certain judicial indications that its location may depend on the way by which a constituent instrument responds to the disputed issue. The author will turn attention, also, to the meeting points of judicial interpretation and informal modification.","PeriodicalId":45438,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmad019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Induced by the work of the Institute of International Law on the limits to evolutive (dynamic) interpretation of constituent instruments of international organizations, the author discusses the issues of evolutive and dynamic interpretation, limits to the interpretation, legitimacy of informal modification of constituent instruments and borderline between interpretation and informal modification. He will propose conditions under which an informal modification may be legitimate. In spite of the fact that the borderline between interpretation and informal modification cannot be precisely located, the author will refer to certain judicial indications that its location may depend on the way by which a constituent instrument responds to the disputed issue. The author will turn attention, also, to the meeting points of judicial interpretation and informal modification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际组织组成文件的演变(动态)解释和非正式修改
在国际法研究所关于国际组织组成文件演化(动态)解释的局限性的研究的启发下,作者讨论了演化与动态解释、解释的局限性、组成文件非正式修改的合法性以及解释与非正式修改之间的界限等问题。他将提出一些条件,在这些条件下,非正式的修改可能是合法的。尽管解释和非正式修改之间的界线不能精确地确定,但发件人将提到某些司法指示,即其位置可能取决于组成文书对有争议问题作出反应的方式。笔者还将关注司法解释与非正式修改的交汇点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of International Law is the leading forum for articles on international law by Chinese scholars and on international law issues relating to China. An independent, peer-reviewed research journal edited primarily by scholars from mainland China, and published in association with the Chinese Society of International Law, Beijing, and Wuhan University Institute of International Law, Wuhan, the Journal is a general international law journal with a focus on materials and viewpoints from and/or about China, other parts of Asia, and the broader developing world.
期刊最新文献
Navigating New Waters: IMO’s Efforts to Regulate Autonomous Shipping Jurisdiction of a State Party under Article 2(1) of the ICCPR: A Comment on A.S. and Others v. Italy The 2022 ICJ Judgment in Nicaragua v. Colombia: Towards a Theory of Exclusivity in Allocating Rights and Jurisdiction between the Coastal and Other States? ILC Draft Conclusions on General Principles of Law Through the Lens of Air and Space Law Practices Comments on the Text of the Draft Conclusions on General Principles of Law Adopted by the ILC on First Reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1