Child consultation and the law in the Northern Territory of Australia

Q2 Social Sciences Children Australia Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI:10.1017/CHA.2019.11
Danielle Kendall-Hall
{"title":"Child consultation and the law in the Northern Territory of Australia","authors":"Danielle Kendall-Hall","doi":"10.1017/CHA.2019.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Consultation with children is a delicate art, and consultation with vulnerable children, even more so. Experienced clinicians believe best practice in undertaking such work requires tertiary studies in social work or psychology combined with extensive supervised clinical experience. The current pathways to becoming a children’s lawyer in the Northern Territory do not involve mandatory training in child well-being, and yet lawyers are asked to consult with highly traumatised children and bring the voices of children into the courtroom. Lawyers for young children are additionally required to provide an opinion as to what they believe to be in the best interests of the child, without a social work or psychology-based qualification, training or in-depth guidelines to support their position. This article looks at what the law says about child consultation, what child development research says about child consultation and child consultation in practice in a Northern Territory child protection setting. At its conclusion, the author discusses potential pathways forward for lawyers and clinicians to work together in safe practices of child consultation.","PeriodicalId":44896,"journal":{"name":"Children Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CHA.2019.11","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CHA.2019.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Consultation with children is a delicate art, and consultation with vulnerable children, even more so. Experienced clinicians believe best practice in undertaking such work requires tertiary studies in social work or psychology combined with extensive supervised clinical experience. The current pathways to becoming a children’s lawyer in the Northern Territory do not involve mandatory training in child well-being, and yet lawyers are asked to consult with highly traumatised children and bring the voices of children into the courtroom. Lawyers for young children are additionally required to provide an opinion as to what they believe to be in the best interests of the child, without a social work or psychology-based qualification, training or in-depth guidelines to support their position. This article looks at what the law says about child consultation, what child development research says about child consultation and child consultation in practice in a Northern Territory child protection setting. At its conclusion, the author discusses potential pathways forward for lawyers and clinicians to work together in safe practices of child consultation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚北领地的儿童咨询和法律
摘要儿童咨询是一门微妙的艺术,弱势儿童咨询更是如此。经验丰富的临床医生认为,从事此类工作的最佳实践需要社会工作或心理学的三级研究,并结合广泛的监督临床经验。在北领地,目前成为儿童律师的途径并不涉及儿童福利方面的强制性培训,但律师们被要求与深受创伤的儿童协商,并将儿童的声音带到法庭上。此外,幼儿律师还被要求提供他们认为最符合儿童利益的意见,而无需社会工作或心理学资格、培训或深入的指导方针来支持他们的立场。这篇文章着眼于法律对儿童咨询的规定,儿童发展研究对儿童咨询和北领地儿童保护环境中儿童咨询的实际规定。最后,作者讨论了律师和临床医生在儿童咨询安全实践中合作的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Children Australia
Children Australia SOCIAL WORK-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Notes to Contributors Editorial Poverty and child abuse and neglect CHA volume 45 issue 4 Cover and Front matter Human Services workers’ experiences of rapidly moving to Telehealth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1