Politics of “I Will”: Penal Populism of Duterte’s War on Drugs, Political Polarization, and the Perceptions of the Working Class

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.12982/cmujasr.2022.007
Macxine Grace P. Medriano, Eric N. Awi
{"title":"Politics of “I Will”: Penal Populism of Duterte’s War on Drugs, Political Polarization, and the Perceptions of the Working Class","authors":"Macxine Grace P. Medriano, Eric N. Awi","doi":"10.12982/cmujasr.2022.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Of all Philippine presidents, Rodrigo Duterte showed a bizarre and unorthodox style of leadership. With the hopes to end the problem of illegal drugs in the Philippines, his administration launched a ground-breaking anti-drug campaign in the name of “oplan tokhang'' which enforces police forces to “knock and plead” to houses of alleged drug users and ask them to surrender. Sixteen million Filipinos saw him as an antidote and the messianic leader for the narco-state the Philippines has apparently spiraled into. This study aims to explore the legitimacy of Duterte’s policy on war on drugs and how it creates political polarization in society through the perceptions of the working class toward safety and order in the country. This phenomenological inquiry analyzes the accounts of the select Filipino working class (n=25) through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Based on the findings, Duterte’s tough-on-crime style of leadership has rather imparted fear and anxiety contrary to the goal of the penal populist policy to bring order and security to the country. It was also revealed that political polarization is present in the Philippines due to the implementation of the said policy, which chronically happens on social media platforms, specifically on Facebook where supporters and non-supporters often exchange heated arguments regarding “tokhang.” While it is true that the main essence of democracy is the free and continuous flow of opinion, political polarization has created a drastic problem that is harmful to a country like the Philippines. Keywords: Institutionalism, Penal policy, Political polarization, Populism, War on drugs","PeriodicalId":40330,"journal":{"name":"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujasr.2022.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Of all Philippine presidents, Rodrigo Duterte showed a bizarre and unorthodox style of leadership. With the hopes to end the problem of illegal drugs in the Philippines, his administration launched a ground-breaking anti-drug campaign in the name of “oplan tokhang'' which enforces police forces to “knock and plead” to houses of alleged drug users and ask them to surrender. Sixteen million Filipinos saw him as an antidote and the messianic leader for the narco-state the Philippines has apparently spiraled into. This study aims to explore the legitimacy of Duterte’s policy on war on drugs and how it creates political polarization in society through the perceptions of the working class toward safety and order in the country. This phenomenological inquiry analyzes the accounts of the select Filipino working class (n=25) through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Based on the findings, Duterte’s tough-on-crime style of leadership has rather imparted fear and anxiety contrary to the goal of the penal populist policy to bring order and security to the country. It was also revealed that political polarization is present in the Philippines due to the implementation of the said policy, which chronically happens on social media platforms, specifically on Facebook where supporters and non-supporters often exchange heated arguments regarding “tokhang.” While it is true that the main essence of democracy is the free and continuous flow of opinion, political polarization has created a drastic problem that is harmful to a country like the Philippines. Keywords: Institutionalism, Penal policy, Political polarization, Populism, War on drugs
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我愿意”的政治:杜特尔特反毒战争的刑罚民粹主义、政治两极分化和工人阶级的看法
摘要在所有菲律宾总统中,罗德里戈·杜特尔特表现出了一种怪异而非正统的领导风格。为了结束菲律宾的非法毒品问题,他的政府以“oplan tokhang”的名义发起了一场开创性的禁毒运动,强制警察部队对涉嫌吸毒者的住宅进行“敲门和恳求”,并要求他们自首。1600万菲律宾人认为他是一剂解药,是菲律宾显然已经陷入毒品国家的救世主般的领导人。本研究旨在探讨杜特尔特禁毒战争政策的合法性,以及它如何通过工人阶级对国家安全和秩序的看法,在社会中造成政治两极分化。这项现象学调查通过半结构化的深度访谈分析了选定的菲律宾工人阶级(n=25)的描述。根据调查结果,杜特尔特严厉打击犯罪的领导风格给人带来了恐惧和焦虑,这与为国家带来秩序和安全的刑罚民粹主义政策的目标背道而驰。据透露,由于上述政策的实施,菲律宾存在政治两极分化,这种情况长期发生在社交媒体平台上,特别是在脸书上,支持者和非支持者经常就“tokhang”进行激烈的争论。虽然民主的主要本质是意见的自由和持续流动,政治两极分化造成了一个严重的问题,对菲律宾这样的国家来说是有害的。关键词:制度主义、刑事政策、政治两极分化、民粹主义、禁毒战争
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Transformational Leadership Behaviors and the Intrinsic Motivation of Employees in Turkey: The Role of Psychological Empowerment and Demographics The Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on China’s Economy The Right to Privacy Regime in India: A Controlled and Authoritative Approach The Rhetoric History of Culture and Nature: The Return of the Native Comparison of Medical Student Syndrome Among Medical Students in Karachi, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1