Oliver Meier and Maren Vieluf respond

Q2 Social Sciences Nonproliferation Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1080/10736700.2022.2093515
Oliver Meier, Maren Vieluf
{"title":"Oliver Meier and Maren Vieluf respond","authors":"Oliver Meier, Maren Vieluf","doi":"10.1080/10736700.2022.2093515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"describe as the dominant tendency of nationalist-populist leaders to “weaken international alliances and multilateral institutions.” Instead, in this case the Ukraine war has had the dramatic effect of strengthening NATO and the European Union, bolstering transatlantic unity, and prodding the United States to reconsider the value of the International Criminal Court. Stalemate in the UN Security Council forced a creative move to a UN General Assembly vote under the Uniting for Peace principle to condemn Russia, while the UN Human Rights Council took the rare step of standing up to a great power and expelled Russia. In other words, Putin’s war has brought about precisely the outcomes he has sought to counter. It has strengthened, rather than weakened, multilateralism and international institutions. Needless to say, however, if Donald Trump were president now instead of Biden, this outcome would have been very different. There would be no Ukraine and no NATO, at least in their current forms. Trump would have given Ukraine to his friend (and creditor) Putin and pulled out of NATO. Two nationalist-populist leaders of great powers, working in tandem, could indeed likely dismantle the transatlantic institutional order.","PeriodicalId":35157,"journal":{"name":"Nonproliferation Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonproliferation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2022.2093515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

describe as the dominant tendency of nationalist-populist leaders to “weaken international alliances and multilateral institutions.” Instead, in this case the Ukraine war has had the dramatic effect of strengthening NATO and the European Union, bolstering transatlantic unity, and prodding the United States to reconsider the value of the International Criminal Court. Stalemate in the UN Security Council forced a creative move to a UN General Assembly vote under the Uniting for Peace principle to condemn Russia, while the UN Human Rights Council took the rare step of standing up to a great power and expelled Russia. In other words, Putin’s war has brought about precisely the outcomes he has sought to counter. It has strengthened, rather than weakened, multilateralism and international institutions. Needless to say, however, if Donald Trump were president now instead of Biden, this outcome would have been very different. There would be no Ukraine and no NATO, at least in their current forms. Trump would have given Ukraine to his friend (and creditor) Putin and pulled out of NATO. Two nationalist-populist leaders of great powers, working in tandem, could indeed likely dismantle the transatlantic institutional order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oliver Meier和Maren Vieluf回应
描述为民族主义民粹主义领导人“削弱国际联盟和多边机构”的主导趋势。相反,在这种情况下,乌克兰战争产生了戏剧性的影响,加强了北约和欧盟,加强了跨大西洋团结,并促使美国重新考虑国际刑事法院的价值。联合国安理会的僵局迫使联合国大会根据“团结谋和平”原则创造性地投票谴责俄罗斯,而联合国人权理事会则采取了罕见的步骤,对抗大国并驱逐了俄罗斯。换言之,普京的战争恰恰带来了他试图对抗的结果。它加强而不是削弱了多边主义和国际机构。然而,不用说,如果唐纳德·特朗普现在是总统而不是拜登,结果会大不相同。不会有乌克兰,也不会有北约,至少以目前的形式是这样。特朗普会把乌克兰交给他的朋友(也是债权人)普京,并退出北约。两位大国的民族主义民粹主义领导人联手,确实有可能破坏跨大西洋的制度秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nonproliferation Review
Nonproliferation Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Poisonous affairs: Russia’s evolving use of poison in covert operations The evolution and future of Israeli nuclear ambiguity Who would trust a nuclear umbrella? Results from an original survey on public confidence in future nuclear guarantees in Morocco BWC assurance: increasing certainty in BWC compliance God isn’t dead: religion, nuclear norms, and the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1