{"title":"Analysis of cesarean section using Robson's ten group classification system in a tertiary care center from Southern India: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Kanmani Murugesan, S. Rengaraj","doi":"10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_152_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The rising cesarean section (CS) rate is a global concern and World Health Organization in 2015 has proposed the use of Robson-10 group classification system as a standard for assessing and monitoring CS both within and across the healthcare facilities. Objective: The objective is to analyze the CSs performed in a teaching hospital using Robson 10-group classification system. Methodology: The present cross-sectional study was done over a period of 1 year from May 2017 to April 2018. All eligible women delivered in JIPMER, a tertiary care referral center during the study period were classified as per Robson Ten-Group classification system. Caesarean delivery rates were reported. The relative and absolute contribution to CS rates in each groups were calculated. Epi data V.3.1 was used for data analysis. Results: Among 16,863 women delivered during the study, the CS rate was 21.4%. The three common indications for CS overall were fetal distress, nonprogress of labor, and cephalopelvic disproportion. Group 1 (nulliparous, singleton, term cephalic, spontaneous labor) was the largest size followed by group 2 (nulliparous, singleton, term cephalic, induced labor) with 25% and 16.9%, respectively. The maximum contribution of CS was by group 5 (multiparous women, singleton, term cephalic, previous uterine scar) followed by group 2 with 34.9% and 18.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Robson group 5, 2, and 1 were the major contributions to CS in our hospital. Further studies are needed to study the appropriateness of indications for CS especially in groups 2 and 1 as they are the future group 5.","PeriodicalId":32355,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"75 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_152_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: The rising cesarean section (CS) rate is a global concern and World Health Organization in 2015 has proposed the use of Robson-10 group classification system as a standard for assessing and monitoring CS both within and across the healthcare facilities. Objective: The objective is to analyze the CSs performed in a teaching hospital using Robson 10-group classification system. Methodology: The present cross-sectional study was done over a period of 1 year from May 2017 to April 2018. All eligible women delivered in JIPMER, a tertiary care referral center during the study period were classified as per Robson Ten-Group classification system. Caesarean delivery rates were reported. The relative and absolute contribution to CS rates in each groups were calculated. Epi data V.3.1 was used for data analysis. Results: Among 16,863 women delivered during the study, the CS rate was 21.4%. The three common indications for CS overall were fetal distress, nonprogress of labor, and cephalopelvic disproportion. Group 1 (nulliparous, singleton, term cephalic, spontaneous labor) was the largest size followed by group 2 (nulliparous, singleton, term cephalic, induced labor) with 25% and 16.9%, respectively. The maximum contribution of CS was by group 5 (multiparous women, singleton, term cephalic, previous uterine scar) followed by group 2 with 34.9% and 18.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Robson group 5, 2, and 1 were the major contributions to CS in our hospital. Further studies are needed to study the appropriateness of indications for CS especially in groups 2 and 1 as they are the future group 5.
背景:剖宫产(CS)率的上升是一个全球关注的问题,世界卫生组织在2015年提出使用Robson-10组分类系统作为在医疗机构内部和整个医疗机构评估和监测CS的标准。目的:应用Robson 10分组分类系统对某教学医院实施的CS进行分析。方法:本横断面研究于2017年5月至2018年4月进行,为期1年。研究期间,在三级护理转诊中心JIPMER分娩的所有符合条件的女性都按照Robson Ten Group分类系统进行了分类。报道了剖腹产率。计算各组对CS发生率的相对和绝对贡献。Epi数据V.3.1用于数据分析。结果:在研究期间分娩的16863名妇女中,CS发生率为21.4%。CS的三个常见指征是胎儿窘迫、分娩不进行和头盆不平衡。第1组(无产仔、单胎、足月产、顺产)规模最大,其次是第2组(无产仔、单例、足月产和引产),分别占25%和16.9%。CS的最大贡献是第5组(多胎女性、单胎、足月头畸形、既往子宫瘢痕),其次是第2组,分别为34.9%和18.9%。结论:罗布森组5、2、1是我院CS发生的主要原因。需要进一步的研究来研究CS适应症的适当性,特别是在第2组和第1组,因为它们是未来的第5组。