False Positive Reaction to VDRL Test with Prozone Phenomenon in a Case of Lepromatous Leprosy

R. Chawla, P. Thakur, Atul Mohan Kochhar, S. Singla
{"title":"False Positive Reaction to VDRL Test with Prozone Phenomenon in a Case of Lepromatous Leprosy","authors":"R. Chawla, P. Thakur, Atul Mohan Kochhar, S. Singla","doi":"10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_12_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test, a nontreponemal test for syphilis, may under a certain set of conditions give false positive results in patients who are not infected with Treponema pallidum. A false positive reaction is defined as a positive reaction to nontreponemal tests, and a negative reaction to treponemal tests, in the serum of a patient who has no history or clinical evidence of syphilis or other treponematosis. A prozone phenomenon in nontreponemal tests is seen largely with secondary syphilis due to high-titer samples that show nonreactive results unless the specimens are diluted. We report here perhaps the first case of lepromatous leprosy, which had a false positive reaction to the VDRL test with the prozone phenomenon. The case initially presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of epistaxis with nasal stuffiness. The finding of septal perforation on nasal endoscopy is what led to the initial suspicion of syphilis and the subsequent syphilis workup. It was only when the false positive reaction to VDRL test with the prozone phenomenon was noted that the search for other causes was made, which eventually lead to the diagnosis of lepromatous leprosy.","PeriodicalId":32900,"journal":{"name":"MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_12_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test, a nontreponemal test for syphilis, may under a certain set of conditions give false positive results in patients who are not infected with Treponema pallidum. A false positive reaction is defined as a positive reaction to nontreponemal tests, and a negative reaction to treponemal tests, in the serum of a patient who has no history or clinical evidence of syphilis or other treponematosis. A prozone phenomenon in nontreponemal tests is seen largely with secondary syphilis due to high-titer samples that show nonreactive results unless the specimens are diluted. We report here perhaps the first case of lepromatous leprosy, which had a false positive reaction to the VDRL test with the prozone phenomenon. The case initially presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of epistaxis with nasal stuffiness. The finding of septal perforation on nasal endoscopy is what led to the initial suspicion of syphilis and the subsequent syphilis workup. It was only when the false positive reaction to VDRL test with the prozone phenomenon was noted that the search for other causes was made, which eventually lead to the diagnosis of lepromatous leprosy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1例麻风性麻风病VDRL试验假阳性反应及Prozone现象
性病研究实验室(VDRL)检测是梅毒的一种非梅毒螺旋体检测,在一定条件下,未感染梅毒螺旋体的患者可能出现假阳性结果。假阳性反应定义为无梅毒或其他密螺旋体病病史或临床证据的患者血清中对非密螺旋体试验出现阳性反应,对密螺旋体试验出现阴性反应。在非梅毒螺旋体试验中,prozone现象主要见于继发性梅毒,因为高滴度的样本显示无反应性结果,除非将样本稀释。我们在这里报告可能是第一例麻风性麻风,这是一个假阳性反应的VDRL试验与prozone现象。该病例最初以鼻出血和鼻塞的主诉到门诊就诊。鼻中隔穿孔的鼻腔内窥镜检查是什么导致最初怀疑梅毒和随后的梅毒检查。只有在注意到VDRL试验与丙酮现象的假阳性反应时,才开始寻找其他原因,最终导致诊断为麻风性麻风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The clinical, sociodemographic, and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics influencing quality of life in patients with epilepsy Should planning of cervical pedicle screws be race specific? Computed tomography–based morphometric analysis A Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in Infants and Children A randomized controlled study to compare the dose requirement of oxytocin for management of uterine atony in patients receiving prophylactic phenylephrine during caesarean delivery Artificial intelligence and healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1