Organic Acids for Stimulation Purposes: A Review

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM Spe Production & Operations Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.2118/199291-PA
Luai Alhamad, Ahmed A. Alrashed, E. Munif, J. Miskimins
{"title":"Organic Acids for Stimulation Purposes: A Review","authors":"Luai Alhamad, Ahmed A. Alrashed, E. Munif, J. Miskimins","doi":"10.2118/199291-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is the acid of choice for acidizing operations in most carbonate formations, and is the base acid that is commonly paired with hydrofluoric acid (HF) in most sandstone applications. However, high dissolving power, high corrosion rate, lack of penetration, and sludging tendency coupled with high temperature (HT) can make HCl a poor choice. Alternatively, weaker and less-corrosive chemicals, such as organic acids, can be used instead of HCl to avoid these issues. The objective of this paper is to provide an intensive review on recent advancements, technology, and problems associated with organic acids. The paper focuses on formic, acetic, citric, and lactic acids.\n This review includes various laboratory evaluation tests and field cases that outline the use of organic acids for formation-damage removal and dissolution. Rotating-disk-apparatus (RDA) results were reviewed to determine the kinetics for acid dissolution of different minerals. Additional results were collected from solubility, corrosion, coreflooding, inductively coupled plasma, X-ray diffraction, and scanning-electron-microscope (SEM) diffraction tests.\n Because of their retardation performance, organic acids have been used along with mineral acids, mainly a formic/HCl mixture, or as a standalone solution for HT applications. However, the main drawback of these acids is the solubility of reaction-product salts. This challenge has been a limiting factor of using citric acid with calcium-rich formations because of the low solubility of calcium citrate. However, the solubility of the salts associated with formic, acetic, and lactic acid can be increased when these acids are mixed with gluconic acid because of the ability of gluconate ion to chelate calcium-based precipitation. In terms of formation-failure response, organic acids are in lower risk of causing a failure compared with HCl, specifically at deep formation treatments. Organic acids have also been used in other applications. For instance, formic acid is used in HT operations as an intensifier to reduce the corrosion rate caused by HCl. Formic, acetic, and lactic acids can be used to dissolve drilling-mud filter cakes. Citric acid is commonly used as an iron-sequestering agent.\n This paper shows organic acid advances, limitations, and applications in oil and gas operations, specifically in acidizing jobs. The paper differentiates and closes the gap between various organic acid applications along with providing researchers an intensive guide for present and future research.","PeriodicalId":22071,"journal":{"name":"Spe Production & Operations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/199291-PA","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Production & Operations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/199291-PA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is the acid of choice for acidizing operations in most carbonate formations, and is the base acid that is commonly paired with hydrofluoric acid (HF) in most sandstone applications. However, high dissolving power, high corrosion rate, lack of penetration, and sludging tendency coupled with high temperature (HT) can make HCl a poor choice. Alternatively, weaker and less-corrosive chemicals, such as organic acids, can be used instead of HCl to avoid these issues. The objective of this paper is to provide an intensive review on recent advancements, technology, and problems associated with organic acids. The paper focuses on formic, acetic, citric, and lactic acids. This review includes various laboratory evaluation tests and field cases that outline the use of organic acids for formation-damage removal and dissolution. Rotating-disk-apparatus (RDA) results were reviewed to determine the kinetics for acid dissolution of different minerals. Additional results were collected from solubility, corrosion, coreflooding, inductively coupled plasma, X-ray diffraction, and scanning-electron-microscope (SEM) diffraction tests. Because of their retardation performance, organic acids have been used along with mineral acids, mainly a formic/HCl mixture, or as a standalone solution for HT applications. However, the main drawback of these acids is the solubility of reaction-product salts. This challenge has been a limiting factor of using citric acid with calcium-rich formations because of the low solubility of calcium citrate. However, the solubility of the salts associated with formic, acetic, and lactic acid can be increased when these acids are mixed with gluconic acid because of the ability of gluconate ion to chelate calcium-based precipitation. In terms of formation-failure response, organic acids are in lower risk of causing a failure compared with HCl, specifically at deep formation treatments. Organic acids have also been used in other applications. For instance, formic acid is used in HT operations as an intensifier to reduce the corrosion rate caused by HCl. Formic, acetic, and lactic acids can be used to dissolve drilling-mud filter cakes. Citric acid is commonly used as an iron-sequestering agent. This paper shows organic acid advances, limitations, and applications in oil and gas operations, specifically in acidizing jobs. The paper differentiates and closes the gap between various organic acid applications along with providing researchers an intensive guide for present and future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于刺激目的的有机酸:综述
在大多数碳酸盐地层中,盐酸(HCl)是酸化作业的首选酸,在大多数砂岩应用中,盐酸通常与氢氟酸(HF)配对。然而,高溶解力、高腐蚀速率、缺乏渗透性、易起泥,再加上高温(HT),使得HCl成为不理想的选择。另外,可以使用较弱且腐蚀性较弱的化学物质,如有机酸,来代替盐酸,以避免这些问题。本文的目的是对有机酸的最新进展、技术和相关问题进行深入的综述。本文的重点是甲酸、乙酸、柠檬酸和乳酸。本综述包括各种实验室评估测试和现场案例,概述了有机酸在地层损害清除和溶解中的应用。综述了旋转圆盘法测定不同矿物酸溶动力学的结果。另外还收集了溶解度、腐蚀、堆芯注水、电感耦合等离子体、x射线衍射和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)衍射测试的结果。由于其缓凝性能,有机酸已与无机酸一起使用,主要是甲酸/盐酸混合物,或作为高温处理应用的独立溶液。然而,这些酸的主要缺点是反应产物盐的溶解度。由于柠檬酸钙的溶解度低,这一挑战一直是在富钙地层中使用柠檬酸的限制因素。然而,当这些酸与葡萄糖酸混合时,与甲酸、乙酸和乳酸相关的盐的溶解度可以增加,因为葡萄糖酸离子能够螯合钙基沉淀。在地层破坏响应方面,与HCl相比,有机酸造成地层破坏的风险更低,特别是在深层地层处理中。有机酸在其他方面也有应用。例如,甲酸在高温作业中用作增强剂,以降低HCl引起的腐蚀速率。甲酸、乙酸和乳酸可用于溶解钻井泥浆滤饼。柠檬酸是常用的铁螯合剂。本文介绍了有机酸在油气作业中的进展、局限性及其应用,特别是在酸化作业中的应用。本文区分并缩小了各种有机酸应用之间的差距,为研究人员提供了当前和未来研究的深入指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spe Production & Operations
Spe Production & Operations 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: SPE Production & Operations includes papers on production operations, artificial lift, downhole equipment, formation damage control, multiphase flow, workovers, stimulation, facility design and operations, water treatment, project management, construction methods and equipment, and related PFC systems and emerging technologies.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a New Proprietary Vortex Fluid Sucker Rod Pump System to Improve Production by Enhancing Flow Dynamics Geomechanical Modeling of Fracture-Induced Vertical Strain Measured by Distributed Fiber-Optic Strain Sensing Kaolinite Effects on Injectivity Impairment: Field Evidence and Laboratory Results Emulsification Characteristics and Electrolyte-Optimized Demulsification of Produced Liquid from Polymer Flooding on Alaska North Slope Dimensionless Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Multiphase Flow Pattern Recognition in Horizontal Pipe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1