Role of greater occipital nerve block for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A critical review

Q3 Medicine Cephalalgia Reports Pub Date : 2020-10-27 DOI:10.1177/2515816320964401
D. Chowdhury, A. Mundra
{"title":"Role of greater occipital nerve block for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A critical review","authors":"D. Chowdhury, A. Mundra","doi":"10.1177/2515816320964401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to critically analyze the evidence of the efficacy and safety of greater occipital nerve (GON) block for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM). Background: A rigorous scientific assessment of efficacy and safety of the GON block for preventive treatment in CM is not available. This critical review was undertaken for this purpose. Methods: References for this review were identified by searches of articles published in the English language in PubMed between 1969 and April 15, 2020 using “greater occipital nerve block,” “chronic migraine,” “migraine,” “headache,” and “treatment” as keywords. Results: Out of potential 532 articles, 9 open-label and 4 placebo-controlled trials that studied the role of GON block for prevention of CM were identified and reviewed. Open-label trials reported a reduction of headache severity and frequency in 35–68% of patients. The beneficial effect of a single block lasted up to 4 weeks. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used varied methodology and techniques of GON block and the outcomes were reported at different time points. A single RCT showed a beneficial effect of the GON block at 1 week. However, the GON block was found to be safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: Long-term efficacy of GON block in CM shall need further well-designed RCTs using standardized methodology. This study, in addition, reviewed the limitations and uncertainties regarding the technique and methods of use of GON block in CM.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320964401","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320964401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to critically analyze the evidence of the efficacy and safety of greater occipital nerve (GON) block for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM). Background: A rigorous scientific assessment of efficacy and safety of the GON block for preventive treatment in CM is not available. This critical review was undertaken for this purpose. Methods: References for this review were identified by searches of articles published in the English language in PubMed between 1969 and April 15, 2020 using “greater occipital nerve block,” “chronic migraine,” “migraine,” “headache,” and “treatment” as keywords. Results: Out of potential 532 articles, 9 open-label and 4 placebo-controlled trials that studied the role of GON block for prevention of CM were identified and reviewed. Open-label trials reported a reduction of headache severity and frequency in 35–68% of patients. The beneficial effect of a single block lasted up to 4 weeks. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used varied methodology and techniques of GON block and the outcomes were reported at different time points. A single RCT showed a beneficial effect of the GON block at 1 week. However, the GON block was found to be safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: Long-term efficacy of GON block in CM shall need further well-designed RCTs using standardized methodology. This study, in addition, reviewed the limitations and uncertainties regarding the technique and methods of use of GON block in CM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枕大神经阻滞在慢性偏头痛预防治疗中的作用:一个重要的回顾
目的:本研究的目的是批判性地分析枕大神经(GON)阻滞预防治疗慢性偏头痛(CM)的有效性和安全性。背景:目前还没有严格的科学评估谷氨酰胺阻断剂用于CM预防性治疗的有效性和安全性。这次批判性审查就是为此目的进行的。方法:本综述的参考文献通过检索1969年至2020年4月15日期间在PubMed上发表的英文文章来确定,关键词为“大枕神经阻滞”、“慢性偏头痛”、“偏头痛”、“头痛”和“治疗”。结果:在潜在的532篇文章中,9篇开放标签试验和4篇安慰剂对照试验研究了谷氨酰胺阻断剂预防CM的作用。开放标签试验报告了35-68%患者头痛严重程度和频率的降低。单次阻滞的有益效果持续4周。随机对照试验(rct)采用了不同的方法和技术,并在不同的时间点报告了结果。一项单独的随机对照试验显示,在1周时,肾上腺素阻断有有益的效果。然而,GON阻断被发现是安全且耐受性良好的。结论:谷氨酰胺阻断治疗CM的长期疗效需要进一步设计良好的随机对照试验,采用标准化的方法。此外,本研究还回顾了在CM中使用GON块的技术和方法的局限性和不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Protocol of a cross-sectional, multicentre and multidisciplinary study describing phenotype and burden of a midfacial segment pain Paranoid psychosis after a single parenteral dose of indomethacin administered for headache diagnosis: A case and review of the literature Extended regular use of kinetic oscillation stimulation (KOS) in refractory chronic migraine: case report of a first, single-subject experience Corrigendum to “Eptinezumab administered intravenously, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly in healthy subjects and/or patients with migraine: Early development studies” A century of bruxism research in top-ranking medical journals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1