Women’s equal representation in the higher judiciary: a case for judicial diversity in India

Gita Mittal, D. Jain
{"title":"Women’s equal representation in the higher judiciary: a case for judicial diversity in India","authors":"Gita Mittal, D. Jain","doi":"10.1080/01924036.2022.2164317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Diversity is an inherent feature of democratic nations. However, in many democracies such as India, the judiciary does not reflect the rich diversity of the country. Most judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts in India are cis-gender, upper-caste men. This homogenises the perspective on law and justice. Women judges and lawyers are faced with structural barriers such as gender stereotypes, discrimination, harassment, and insufficient institutional and infrastructural support. Additionally, caste, class, sexuality, and religious identity are some factors that create multiple axes of oppression to contend with. Through a critical examination of various feminist lenses, we highlight the systemic and implicit biases that lead to disproportionately low numbers of women judges. We then recommend institutional reforms that could facilitate the creation of a more diverse higher judiciary in India.","PeriodicalId":45887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","volume":"47 1","pages":"185 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2022.2164317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Diversity is an inherent feature of democratic nations. However, in many democracies such as India, the judiciary does not reflect the rich diversity of the country. Most judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts in India are cis-gender, upper-caste men. This homogenises the perspective on law and justice. Women judges and lawyers are faced with structural barriers such as gender stereotypes, discrimination, harassment, and insufficient institutional and infrastructural support. Additionally, caste, class, sexuality, and religious identity are some factors that create multiple axes of oppression to contend with. Through a critical examination of various feminist lenses, we highlight the systemic and implicit biases that lead to disproportionately low numbers of women judges. We then recommend institutional reforms that could facilitate the creation of a more diverse higher judiciary in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性在高等司法机构中的平等代表权:印度司法多元化的案例
摘要多样性是民主国家的固有特征。然而,在印度等许多民主国家,司法机构并没有反映出该国丰富的多样性。印度最高法院和高等法院的大多数法官都是顺性别、上层种姓的男性。这使人们对法律和正义的看法趋于一致。女法官和律师面临着性别陈规定型观念、歧视、骚扰以及机构和基础设施支持不足等结构性障碍。此外,种姓、阶级、性取向和宗教身份是造成多重压迫的因素。通过对各种女权主义视角的批判性审视,我们强调了导致女法官人数过低的系统性和隐性偏见。然后,我们建议进行体制改革,以促进在印度建立一个更加多样化的高等司法机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Exploring public cooperation with police: the role of police accountability, police effectiveness, and public trust A review of restorative justice programmes for First Nations Peoples in Queensland Citizens’ sex offence myths and perceived effectiveness of sex offender community notification in South Korea Legitimacy of the courts: evidence from a survey in Punjab, Pakistan Editorial transition and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1