Společné jmění manželů v judikatorní retrospektivě – aneb stručný příspěvek k problematice kontinuity dřívější rozhodovací praxe v poměrech stávají úpravy
{"title":"Společné jmění manželů v judikatorní retrospektivě – aneb stručný příspěvek k problematice kontinuity dřívější rozhodovací praxe v poměrech stávají úpravy","authors":"Jindřich Psutka","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matrimonial property is a traditional part of the broader regulation of matrimonial property law. This is a specific case of a joint community of property, which can only arise during the marriage and only between spouses. Judicial interpretation has a key role long in the interpretation of this important institute. The adoption of the Civil Code No. 89/2012 Sb. did not change anything. It can be stated almost ten years after its adoption that the decision-making practice largely adheres to its long-term interpretation. Even today are the conclusions of the judicial decision relating to the regulation in force until 1 January 2014 are still largely applicable. However, this general trend also includes a number of relatively substantial exceptions.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Matrimonial property is a traditional part of the broader regulation of matrimonial property law. This is a specific case of a joint community of property, which can only arise during the marriage and only between spouses. Judicial interpretation has a key role long in the interpretation of this important institute. The adoption of the Civil Code No. 89/2012 Sb. did not change anything. It can be stated almost ten years after its adoption that the decision-making practice largely adheres to its long-term interpretation. Even today are the conclusions of the judicial decision relating to the regulation in force until 1 January 2014 are still largely applicable. However, this general trend also includes a number of relatively substantial exceptions.